Joganic Jessica L, Willmore Katherine E, Richtsmeier Joan T, Weiss Kenneth M, Mahaney Michael C, Rogers Jeffrey, Cheverud James M
Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, MCC, De la Préhistoire à l'Actuel: Culture, Environnement et Anthropologie, (PACEA), UMR 5199, Pessac, France.
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2018 Feb;165(2):269-285. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.23349. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
Determining the genetic architecture of quantitative traits and genetic correlations among them is important for understanding morphological evolution patterns. We address two questions regarding papionin evolution: (1) what effect do body and cranial size, age, and sex have on phenotypic (V ) and additive genetic (V ) variation in baboon crania, and (2) how might additive genetic correlations between craniofacial traits and body mass affect morphological evolution?
We use a large captive pedigreed baboon sample to estimate quantitative genetic parameters for craniofacial dimensions (EIDs). Our models include nested combinations of the covariates listed above. We also simulate the correlated response of a given EID due to selection on body mass alone.
Covariates account for 1.2-91% of craniofacial V . EID V decreases across models as more covariates are included. The median genetic correlation estimate between each EID and body mass is 0.33. Analysis of the multivariate response to selection reveals that observed patterns of craniofacial variation in extant baboons cannot be attributed solely to correlated response to selection on body mass, particularly in males.
Because a relatively large proportion of EID V is shared with body mass variation, different methods of correcting for allometry by statistically controlling for size can alter residual V patterns. This may conflate direct selection effects on craniofacial variation with those resulting from a correlated response to body mass selection. This shared genetic variation may partially explain how selection for increased body mass in two different papionin lineages produced remarkably similar craniofacial phenotypes.
确定数量性状的遗传结构及其之间的遗传相关性对于理解形态进化模式至关重要。我们针对狒狒的进化提出两个问题:(1)身体和颅骨大小、年龄及性别对狒狒颅骨的表型变异(V)和加性遗传变异(V)有何影响,以及(2)颅面性状与体重之间的加性遗传相关性如何影响形态进化?
我们使用一个大型圈养的有谱系记录的狒狒样本,来估计颅面尺寸(EIDs)的数量遗传参数。我们的模型包括上述协变量的嵌套组合。我们还单独模拟了仅因对体重进行选择而导致的给定EID的相关反应。
协变量占颅面V的1.2 - 91%。随着纳入更多协变量,各模型中的EID V会降低。每个EID与体重之间的遗传相关性估计中位数为0.33。对选择的多变量反应分析表明,现存狒狒中观察到的颅面变异模式不能仅归因于对体重选择的相关反应,尤其是在雄性中。
由于EID V的相对较大比例与体重变异共享,通过对大小进行统计控制来校正异速生长的不同方法可能会改变残差V模式。这可能会将对颅面变异的直接选择效应与因对体重选择的相关反应所产生的效应混为一谈。这种共享的遗传变异可能部分解释了在两个不同的狒狒谱系中对增加体重的选择如何产生了显著相似的颅面表型。