• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者对美国食品药品监督管理局最新推荐的食品设施检查形式的认知:措辞很重要。

Consumer Perception of the Food and Drug Administration's Newest Recommended Food Facility Inspection Format: Words Matter.

作者信息

Kim Jooho, Ma Jing, Almanza Barbara

出版信息

J Environ Health. 2017 Jun;79(10):20-5.

PMID:29154529
Abstract

The Food and Drug Administration recommended restaurant inspection scores change to a format that incorporated three new categories of violations: priority, priority foundation, and core. It was uncertain whether interested consumers would value the more in-depth information or become more confused. The purpose of this study was to assess consumer perception of the recommended inspection system. Data were collected from an online survey. Results showed that consumers want convenient access to the information either online or on the wall of restaurants, and some consumers do want to read inspection reports and use them in making dining decisions. Choice of restaurant inspection format did appear to change consumer understanding and perceptions about some of the violations. Results also demonstrated the importance of the words used to categorize violations.

摘要

美国食品药品监督管理局建议餐厅检查评分改为一种包含三类新违规行为的形式

重点违规、重点基础违规和核心违规。尚不确定感兴趣的消费者是否会重视更深入的信息,还是会更加困惑。本研究的目的是评估消费者对建议的检查系统的认知。数据通过在线调查收集。结果显示,消费者希望能方便地通过网络或餐厅墙壁获取信息,一些消费者确实想阅读检查报告并在就餐决策时加以利用。餐厅检查形式的选择似乎确实改变了消费者对某些违规行为的理解和认知。结果还表明了用于对违规行为进行分类的措辞的重要性。

相似文献

1
Consumer Perception of the Food and Drug Administration's Newest Recommended Food Facility Inspection Format: Words Matter.消费者对美国食品药品监督管理局最新推荐的食品设施检查形式的认知:措辞很重要。
J Environ Health. 2017 Jun;79(10):20-5.
2
Inspector Perceptions of the Food and Drug Administration's Newest Recommended Food Facility Inspection Format: Training Matters.检查员对美国食品药品监督管理局最新推荐的食品设施检查形式的看法:培训至关重要。
J Environ Health. 2017 Jun;79(10):26-31.
3
A risk-based restaurant inspection system in Los Angeles County.洛杉矶县基于风险的餐厅检查系统。
J Food Prot. 2002 Feb;65(2):367-72. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-65.2.367.
4
Designing a national restaurant inspection disclosure system for New Zealand.为新西兰设计一个国家餐厅检查信息披露系统。
J Food Prot. 2011 Nov;74(11):1869-74. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-007.
5
Certified kitchen managers: do they improve restaurant inspection outcomes?获得认证的厨房经理:他们能改善餐厅检查结果吗?
J Food Prot. 2009 Feb;72(2):384-91. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-72.2.384.
6
Health department inspection criteria more likely to be associated with outbreak restaurants in Minnesota.卫生部门的检查标准更有可能与明尼苏达州的疫情餐馆有关。
J Food Prot. 2012 Nov;75(11):2007-15. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-148.
7
The effects of inspection frequency and food handler education on restaurant inspection violations.检查频率和食品从业人员教育对餐厅检查违规情况的影响。
Can J Public Health. 1995 Jan-Feb;86(1):46-50.
8
Scores and grades: a sampling of how college students and food safety professionals interpret restaurant inspection results.评分与等级:大学生和食品安全专业人员对餐厅检查结果的解读抽样
J Environ Health. 2001 Dec;64(5):14-9, 33-4.
9
Impact of a letter-grade program on restaurant sanitary conditions and diner behavior in New York City.纽约市字母等级评定计划对餐厅卫生状况及用餐者行为的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Mar;105(3):e81-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302404. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
10
Evaluation of a local health department's food handler training program.对当地卫生部门食品从业人员培训项目的评估。
J Environ Health. 2011 Jan-Feb;73(6):65-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining Food Safety Inspection.定义食品安全检查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 11;19(2):789. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020789.