Quentmeier A, Schlag P, Hohenberger P, Schwarz V, Abel U
Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, West Germany.
J Surg Oncol. 1989 Feb;40(2):112-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.2930400211.
It is difficult, time-consuming, and expensive to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of regional chemotherapy of metastatic liver disease by means of imaging procedures. Therefore it was the aim of this study to find out whether serial carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) determinations yield reliable data on the therapeutic progress and the individual prognosis of these patients. Since there exists no generally accepted modality to assess CEA curves of patients receiving chemotherapy, we developed our own criterion and tested it in a group of 35 patients. For each patient an individual reference level (CEA-means) was fixed which was obtained as the arithmetical mean of serial CEA values taken during the first three courses of chemotherapy (reference time). On the basis of CEA-means the marker curves of the 35 patients could be divided into two groups. After the reference time the CEA values of group 1 (12 patients) never decreased below CEA-means. Survival of these patients was significantly (P = 0.00001) shorter than that of the 23 patients (group 2) who showed a decrease in their CEA curves below CEA-means after the reference time. Beyond this it could be observed that the improvement in survival was significantly greater in those patients who showed a CEA decrease below CEA-means for a prolonged period (3 months). This difference in prognosis is not an artefact due to different pretherapeutic conditions but is a sign of different responses to therapy. The decrease in CEA values below the individual reference level (CEA-means) is a certain sign of the efficacy of the chosen chemotherapy. A continuous rise of the CEA curve above CEA-means signifies an ineffective intrahepatic chemotherapy or extrahepatic tumor manifestation. In this case an intensive diagnostic workup of the patient and possibly a modification of the therapy are indicated.
通过影像学检查评估转移性肝病区域化疗的疗效既困难、耗时又昂贵。因此,本研究的目的是确定连续测定癌胚抗原(CEA)是否能为这些患者的治疗进展和个体预后提供可靠数据。由于目前尚无普遍接受的方法来评估接受化疗患者的CEA曲线,我们制定了自己的标准,并在35例患者中进行了测试。为每位患者确定一个个体参考水平(CEA均值),该参考水平是在化疗的前三个疗程(参考时间)期间采集的系列CEA值的算术平均值。根据CEA均值,35例患者的标志物曲线可分为两组。在参考时间之后,第1组(12例患者)的CEA值从未降至CEA均值以下。这些患者的生存期明显(P = 0.00001)短于第2组的23例患者,第2组患者在参考时间之后其CEA曲线降至CEA均值以下。除此之外,可以观察到,CEA降至CEA均值以下持续较长时间(3个月)的患者,其生存期的改善明显更大。这种预后差异并非由于不同的治疗前状况导致的假象,而是对治疗不同反应的标志。CEA值降至个体参考水平(CEA均值)以下是所选化疗有效的确定标志。CEA曲线持续高于CEA均值表明肝内化疗无效或存在肝外肿瘤表现。在这种情况下,需要对患者进行深入的诊断检查,并可能需要调整治疗方案。