Suppr超能文献

使用德桥评分系统对姑息性放疗后恶性硬膜外脊髓压迫进行生存分析及全身治疗的影响。

Survival analysis of malignant epidural spinal cord compression after palliative radiotherapy using Tokuhashi scoring system and the impact of systemic therapy.

作者信息

Mui Wing Ho, Lam Tai Chung, Wong Frank Chi Sing, Sze Wing King

机构信息

Hong Kong Academy of Medicine (Radiology), Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Hong Kong Academy of Medicine (Radiology), Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

Ann Palliat Med. 2017 Dec;6(Suppl 2):S132-S139. doi: 10.21037/apm.2017.07.06. Epub 2017 Aug 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown similar clinical outcomes of both single and multi-fraction (Fr) radiation therapy among malignant epidural spinal cord compression (MSCC) patients with poor prognosis; whereas, patients expected to have longer survival may require long-course radiotherapy to prevent local failure. However, such a poor prognosis risk group has not yet been clearly identified for use in daily clinical practice. We examined if the known predictive Tokuhashi scoring system could be adapted in MSCC patients treated with palliative radiation therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the treatment outcomes of MSCC patients who received palliative radiotherapy from January 2014 to May 2015 was conducted. The patients were stratified into two groups according to the Tokuhashi scoring system: group 1 (score <9), expected survival <6 months, and group 2 (score >8), expected survival >6 months. Their survival was tested against subsequent systemic therapy (chemotherapy, targeted or hormonal therapy) and other risk factors including age, primary site, visceral metastasis, baseline motor function, prior radiotherapy and radiotherapy fractionation (single or multiple).

RESULTS

The outcomes of 119 patients were studied, 116 (97.5%) patients had already succumbed. The overall median survival was 55 days (range, 4-576 days). Ninety-three patients (78.2%) belonged to group 1. The median dose delivered was 25 Gy in 5 Frs [range, 7 Gy in 2 Frs-40 Gy in 10 Frs (to the cauda equina)]. Only nine patients (7.6%) received single-Fr radiotherapy, all belonging to Tokuhashi group 1. Patients belonging to group 1 had shorter median survival than group 2; 49 and 108 days, respectively (P=0.003). Among all the patients, subsequent systemic treatment [hazard ratio (HR) =0.407; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.236-0.702; P=0.001], non-visceral metastasis (HR =0.608; 95% CI, 0.387-0.956; P=0.031) and primary lung or breast or prostate cancer (P=0.029) were associated with better survival in multivariate analysis. For patients in group 1, primary breast or prostate cancer (HR =0.264; 95% CI, 0.122-0.572; P=0.001) or lung cancer (HR =0.421; 95% CI, 0.246-0.719; P=0.002), non-visceral metastasis (HR =0.453; 95% CI, 0.264-0.777; P=0.004), multi-Fr (HR =0.455; 95% CI, 0.217-0.956; P=0.038) and subsequent systemic therapy (HR =0.460; 95% CI, 0.252-0.842; P=0.012) were associated with better survival. The survival of a subset of patients in group 1 without subsequent systemic therapy was dismal (median survival only 40 days) and not altered by radiotherapy schedule (P=0.189).

CONCLUSIONS

MSCC comprises a very heterogenous group of patients, even under the Tokuhashi grouping. Systemic therapy or visceral metastasis may be more important prognostic factors. Further studies are necessary to better select the poor prognosis risk group. In clinical practice, single-Fr radiotherapy could be considered in Tokuhashi group 1 patients due to their expected short survival, especially for those without reasonable systemic treatment options.

摘要

背景

既往研究表明,预后较差的恶性硬膜外脊髓压迫(MSCC)患者接受单次分割和多次分割放疗的临床结局相似;然而,预期生存期较长的患者可能需要长疗程放疗以预防局部复发。然而,尚未明确确定这样一个预后较差的风险组用于日常临床实践。我们研究了已知的Tokuhashi评分系统是否可适用于接受姑息性放疗的MSCC患者。

方法

对2014年1月至2015年5月接受姑息性放疗的MSCC患者的治疗结局进行回顾性分析。根据Tokuhashi评分系统将患者分为两组:1组(评分<9),预期生存期<6个月;2组(评分>8),预期生存期>6个月。对其生存期与后续全身治疗(化疗、靶向治疗或激素治疗)以及其他危险因素进行比较,这些危险因素包括年龄、原发部位、内脏转移、基线运动功能、既往放疗及放疗分割方式(单次或多次)。

结果

研究了119例患者的结局,116例(97.5%)患者已经死亡。总体中位生存期为55天(范围4 - 576天)。93例(78.2%)患者属于1组。给予的中位剂量为25 Gy,分5次分割[范围,2次分割7 Gy - 10次分割40 Gy(至马尾神经)]。仅9例(7.6%)患者接受单次分割放疗,均属于Tokuhashi 1组。1组患者的中位生存期短于2组;分别为49天和108天(P = 0.003)。在所有患者中,多因素分析显示后续全身治疗[风险比(HR)= 0.407;95%置信区间(CI),0.236 - 0.702;P = 0.001]、无内脏转移(HR = 0.608;95% CI,0.387 - 0.956;P = 0.031)以及原发于肺、乳腺或前列腺的癌症(P = 0.029)与更好的生存期相关。对于1组患者,原发于乳腺或前列腺的癌症(HR = 0.264;95% CI,0.122 - 0.572;P = 0.001)或肺癌(HR = 0.421;95% CI,0.246 - 0.719;P = 0.002)、无内脏转移(HR = 0.453;95% CI,0.264 - 0.777;P = 0.004)、多次分割放疗(HR = 0.455;95% CI,0.217 - 0.956;P = 0.038)以及后续全身治疗(HR = 0.460;95% CI,0.252 - 0.842;P = 0.012)与更好的生存期相关。1组中未接受后续全身治疗的部分患者生存期很差(中位生存期仅40天),且不受放疗方案影响(P = 0.189)。

结论

MSCC患者群体非常异质,即使在Tokuhashi分组下也是如此。全身治疗或内脏转移可能是更重要的预后因素。需要进一步研究以更好地选择预后较差的风险组。在临床实践中,对于Tokuhashi 1组患者,鉴于其预期生存期短,尤其是那些没有合理全身治疗选择的患者,可考虑单次分割放疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验