Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano - Italy, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018 Apr;30(4):e13253. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13253. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
BACKGROUND: Multiple rapid swallows (MRS) is a provocative test for assessment of contraction reserve, however reproducibility on repetitive MRS is incompletely understood. Our aim was to determine the optimal number of MRS sequences for consistent assessment of contraction reserve. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-nine consecutive patients (79 IEM and 80 normal motility) who underwent high-resolution manometers were enrolled. Ten single swallows (SS) and 10 MRS were performed. Gold standard for evaluation of the contraction reserve was the ratio between the mean DCI of 10 MRS and the mean DCI of 10 SS (MRS/SS DCI ratio). Rates of false negatives and false positives were calculated for increasing numbers of MRS sequences, using either mean DCI or the MRS with the highest DCI. KEY RESULTS: According to the gold standard, 50 IEM and 50 normal motility patients had contraction reserve. With progressively increasing numbers of MRS sequences, contraction reserve was detected using mean MRS DCI within three and four MRS sequences in IEM and normal motility respectively, whereas two and three MRS sequences were needed using the MRS sequence with the highest DCI. False positives were much higher with highest DCI method compared with mean DCI, (22% vs 9% respectively in IEM; 24% vs 9% in normal motility) when three MRS sequences were considered. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: At least three MRS are needed to reliably assess contraction reserve. The mean DCI of the three MRS sequences is the best variable to utilize as evidence of contraction reserve.
背景:多次快速吞咽(MRS)是评估收缩储备的一种激发试验,但重复性 MRS 的可重复性尚不完全清楚。我们的目的是确定进行一致收缩储备评估的最佳 MRS 序列数。
方法:招募了 159 名连续接受高分辨率测压的患者(79 名 IEM 和 80 名正常动力)。进行了 10 次单吞咽(SS)和 10 次 MRS。评估收缩储备的金标准是 10 次 MRS 的平均 DCI 与 10 次 SS 的平均 DCI 的比值(MRS/SS DCI 比值)。使用平均 DCI 或 MRS 中 DCI 最高的 MRS,计算增加 MRS 序列数时的假阴性和假阳性率。
主要结果:根据金标准,有 50 名 IEM 和 50 名正常动力患者具有收缩储备。随着 MRS 序列数的逐渐增加,在 IEM 和正常动力中,分别在 3 次和 4 次 MRS 序列中使用平均 MRS DCI 检测到收缩储备,而使用 MRS 中 DCI 最高的 MRS 序列则需要 2 次和 3 次 MRS 序列。当考虑 3 次 MRS 序列时,使用最高 DCI 方法的假阳性率明显高于平均 DCI(分别为 IEM 中的 22%与 9%,正常动力中的 24%与 9%)。
结论:至少需要进行 3 次 MRS 才能可靠地评估收缩储备。三个 MRS 序列的平均 DCI 是作为收缩储备证据的最佳变量。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017-11-21
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2018-12-13
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018-4-14
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2025-1-31
Tzu Chi Med J. 2024-3-26
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023-8
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022-10-30
Gastroenterology. 2022-5
Dysphagia. 2023-4
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021-7-30