Chen Tianxiang, Luo Jizhuang, Gu Haiyong, Gu Yu, Huang Qingyuan, Wang Yiyang, Zheng Jiajie, Yang Yunhai, Chen Haiquan
Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Jan;105(1):302-308. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.08.018. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
Few studies focus on the outcome and effect of a postsurgical treatment strategy for early stage patients with minor solid components pattern. This study investigated the prognosis and the adjuvant chemotherapy benefit among stage I invasive lung adenocarcinoma patients with minor solid components pattern according to the eighth TNM staging classification.
A total of 3,308 lung adenocarcinoma patients with mixed histologic components was divided into three groups: solid predominant, solid minor, and solid absent pattern. Disease-free survival and overall survival were analyzed to evaluate survival difference among patients in the different groups using the Kaplan-Meier approach and multivariable Cox models.
Both solid predominant and solid minor groups showed significantly worse disease-free survival (p < 0.001) and overall survival (p < 0.001) compared with the solid absent group. There were no significant disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87 to 2.30, p = 0.161) or overall survival (HR 1.60, 95% CI: 0.83 to 3.09, p = 0.159) difference between the former two groups. For patients in stage IB, adjuvant chemotherapy improves disease-free survival (HR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.11 to 1.02, p = 0.044) but not overall survival (HR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.21 to 1.77, p = 0.360) in the solid predominant group. No adjuvant chemotherapy benefits for disease-free survival (HR 1.04, 95% CI: 0.49 to 2.22; p = 0.922) and overall survival (HR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.13 to 1.90; p = 0.291) were seen for the solid minor group.
Solid minor components predict a significantly worse prognosis compared with the solid absent pattern. However, adjuvant chemotherapy may be unhelpful to improve outcomes for stage IB patients with solid minor components after surgery.
很少有研究关注早期微小实性成分型患者术后治疗策略的结果和效果。本研究根据第八版TNM分期分类,调查了I期微小实性成分型浸润性肺腺癌患者的预后及辅助化疗的益处。
总共3308例具有混合组织学成分的肺腺癌患者被分为三组:实性为主型、微小实性型和无实性型。采用Kaplan-Meier法和多变量Cox模型分析无病生存期和总生存期,以评估不同组患者的生存差异。
与无实性型组相比,实性为主型和微小实性型组的无病生存期(p < 0.001)和总生存期(p < 0.001)均显著更差。前两组之间在无病生存期(风险比[HR] 1.41,95%置信区间[CI]:0.87至2.30,p = 0.161)或总生存期(HR 1.60,95% CI:0.83至3.09,p = 0.159)方面无显著差异。对于IB期患者,辅助化疗可改善实性为主型组的无病生存期(HR 0.33,95% CI:0.11至1.02,p = 0.044),但不能改善总生存期(HR 0.61,95% CI:0.21至1.77,p = 0.360)。微小实性型组在无病生存期(HR 1.04,95% CI:0.49至2.22;p = 0.922)和总生存期(HR 0.49,95% CI:0.13至1.90;p = 0.291)方面未显示出辅助化疗的益处。
与无实性型相比,微小实性成分预示着更差的预后。然而,辅助化疗可能无助于改善术后微小实性成分型IB期患者的结局。