Arnold Paul M, Harrop James S, Merli Geno, Tetreault Lindsay G, Kwon Brian K, Casha Steve, Palmieri Katherine, Wilson Jefferson R, Fehlings Michael G, Holmer Haley K, Norvell Daniel C
University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Global Spine J. 2017 Sep;7(3 Suppl):138S-150S. doi: 10.1177/2192568217703665. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
Systematic review.
The objective of this study was to answer 5 key questions: What is the comparative effectiveness and safety of (1a) anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis compared to no prophylaxis, placebo, or another anticoagulant strategy for preventing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) after acute spinal cord injury (SCI)? (1b) Mechanical prophylaxis strategies alone or in combination with other strategies for preventing DVT and PE after acute SCI? (1c) Prophylactic inferior vena cava filter insertion alone or in combination with other strategies for preventing DVT and PE after acute SCI? (2) What is the optimal timing to initiate and/or discontinue anticoagulant, mechanical, and/or prophylactic inferior vena cava filter following acute SCI? (3) What is the cost-effectiveness of these treatment options?
A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies published through February 28, 2015. We sought randomized controlled trials evaluating efficacy and safety of antithrombotic strategies. Strength of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.
Nine studies satisfied inclusion criteria. We found a trend toward lower risk of DVT in patients treated with enoxaparin. There were no significant differences in rates of DVT, PE, bleeding, and mortality between patients treated with different types of low-molecular-weight heparin or between low-molecular-weight heparin and unfractionated heparin. Combined anticoagulant and mechanical prophylaxis initiated within 72 hours of SCI resulted in lower risk of DVT than treatment commenced after 72 hours of injury.
Prophylactic treatments can be used to lower the risk of venous thromboembolic events in patients with acute SCI, without significant increase in risk of bleeding and mortality and should be initiated within 72 hours.
系统评价。
本研究的目的是回答5个关键问题:(1a)与不进行预防、使用安慰剂或其他抗凝策略相比,抗凝血栓预防在预防急性脊髓损伤(SCI)后深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和肺栓塞(PE)方面的相对有效性和安全性如何?(1b)单独使用机械预防策略或与其他策略联合使用,在预防急性SCI后DVT和PE方面的效果如何?(1c)单独使用预防性下腔静脉滤器置入或与其他策略联合使用,在预防急性SCI后DVT和PE方面的效果如何?(2)急性SCI后启动和/或停用抗凝、机械和/或预防性下腔静脉滤器的最佳时机是什么?(3)这些治疗方案的成本效益如何?
进行系统的文献检索,以识别截至2015年2月28日发表的研究。我们寻找评估抗血栓策略疗效和安全性的随机对照试验。使用推荐分级评估、制定和评价(GRADE)系统评估证据强度。
9项研究符合纳入标准。我们发现接受依诺肝素治疗的患者发生DVT的风险有降低趋势。不同类型低分子肝素治疗的患者之间,或低分子肝素与普通肝素治疗的患者之间,DVT、PE、出血和死亡率发生率无显著差异。SCI后72小时内开始联合抗凝和机械预防,与受伤72小时后开始治疗相比,DVT风险更低。
预防性治疗可用于降低急性SCI患者静脉血栓栓塞事件的风险,且不会显著增加出血和死亡风险,应在72小时内开始。