Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR 97239, USA.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):401-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
This article introduces the approach of GRADE to rating quality of evidence. GRADE specifies four categories-high, moderate, low, and very low-that are applied to a body of evidence, not to individual studies. In the context of a systematic review, quality reflects our confidence that the estimates of the effect are correct. In the context of recommendations, quality reflects our confidence that the effect estimates are adequate to support a particular recommendation. Randomized trials begin as high-quality evidence, observational studies as low quality. "Quality" as used in GRADE means more than risk of bias and so may also be compromised by imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness of study results, and publication bias. In addition, several factors can increase our confidence in an estimate of effect. GRADE provides a systematic approach for considering and reporting each of these factors. GRADE separates the process of assessing quality of evidence from the process of making recommendations. Judgments about the strength of a recommendation depend on more than just the quality of evidence.
本文介绍了 GRADE 对证据质量进行评级的方法。GRADE 将证据质量分为四个等级:高、中、低和极低,适用于证据整体,而不是个别研究。在系统评价的背景下,质量反映了我们对效应估计值正确性的信心。在推荐的背景下,质量反映了我们对效应估计值是否足以支持特定推荐的信心。随机试验开始时为高质量证据,观察性研究为低质量证据。GRADE 中使用的“质量”不仅意味着偏倚风险,因此也可能因研究结果的不精确性、不一致性、间接性和发表偏倚而受到影响。此外,有几个因素可以增加我们对效应估计值的信心。GRADE 提供了一种系统的方法来考虑和报告这些因素。GRADE 将评估证据质量的过程与制定推荐意见的过程分开。对推荐强度的判断不仅仅取决于证据的质量。