El-Khouly Fatma E, van Vuurden Dannis G, Stroink Thom, Hulleman Esther, Kaspers Gertjan J L, Hendrikse N Harry, Veldhuijzen van Zanten Sophie E M
Department of Pediatric Oncology - Hematology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Front Oncol. 2017 Oct 30;7:254. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00254. eCollection 2017.
Despite decades of clinical trials for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), patient survival does not exceed 10% at two years post-diagnosis. Lack of benefit from systemic chemotherapy may be attributed to an intact bloodbrain barrier (BBB). We aim to develop a theoretical model including relevant physicochemical properties in order to review whether applied chemotherapeutics are suitable for passive diffusion through an intact BBB or whether local administration convection-enhanced delivery (CED) may increase their therapeutic potential. Physicochemical properties (lipophilicity, molecular weight, and charge in physiological environment) of anticancer drugs historically and currently administered to DIPG patients, that affect passive diffusion over the BBB, were included in the model. Subsequently, the likelihood of BBB passage of these drugs was ascertained, as well as their potential for intratumoral administration CED. As only non-molecularly charged, lipophilic, and relatively small sized drugs are likely to passively diffuse through the BBB, out of 51 drugs modeled, only 8 (15%)-carmustine, lomustine, erlotinib, vismodegib, lenalomide, thalidomide, vorinostat, and mebendazole-are theoretically qualified for systemic administration in DIPG. Local administration CED might create more therapeutic options, excluding only positively charged drugs and drugs that are either prodrugs and/or only available as oral formulation. A wide variety of drugs have been administered systemically to DIPG patients. Our model shows that only few are likely to penetrate the BBB passive diffusion, which may partly explain the lack of efficacy. Drug distribution CED is less dependent on physicochemical properties and may increase the therapeutic options for DIPG.
尽管针对弥漫性脑桥内在胶质瘤(DIPG)进行了数十年的临床试验,但患者诊断后两年的生存率仍不超过10%。全身化疗未显示出疗效可能归因于完整的血脑屏障(BBB)。我们旨在建立一个包含相关物理化学性质的理论模型,以评估应用的化疗药物是否适合通过完整的血脑屏障进行被动扩散,或者局部给药——对流增强递送(CED)是否可以提高其治疗潜力。模型纳入了历史上和目前用于DIPG患者的、影响其通过血脑屏障进行被动扩散的抗癌药物的物理化学性质(亲脂性、分子量和生理环境中的电荷)。随后,确定了这些药物通过血脑屏障的可能性及其进行瘤内给药——CED的潜力。由于只有不带分子电荷、亲脂且相对较小的药物才可能通过血脑屏障进行被动扩散,在所建模的51种药物中,理论上只有8种(15%)——卡莫司汀、洛莫司汀、厄洛替尼、维莫德吉、来那度胺、沙利度胺、伏立诺他和甲苯达唑——有资格用于DIPG的全身给药。局部给药——CED可能会创造更多治疗选择,唯一排除的是带正电荷的药物以及前体药物和/或仅为口服制剂的药物。已有多种药物用于DIPG患者的全身给药。我们的模型表明,只有少数药物可能通过被动扩散穿透血脑屏障,这可能部分解释了疗效不佳的原因。药物分布——CED较少依赖物理化学性质,可能会增加DIPG的治疗选择。