Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
National Institute of Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Feb;97(2):135-141. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13256. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
In this population-based register study our objective was to explore the association of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, grade 1 and loop electrosurcigal excision procedure with preterm birth.
Our population consisted of 4759 women diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, grade 1 during 1997-2009 and their 3021 subsequent deliveries analyzed by loop electrosurcigal excision procedure and parity. Hospital Discharge Register was used to identify women diagnosed for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, grade 1 and these data were linked with the Medical Birth Register data. We calculated odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, grade 1 patients with loop electrosurcigal excision procedure had 54 (6.7%) subsequent preterm births and the corresponding figure among cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, grade 1 patients without loop electrosurcigal excision procedure was 116 (5.2%). This results in odds ratios 1.31 (95% confidence interval 0.94-1.83). We assessed the risk before and after diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, grade 1 both for patients with loop electrosurcigal excision procedure (odds ratios 1.47, 95% confidence interval 1.05-2.06) and without loop electrosurcigal excision procedure (odds ratios 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.71-1.13). An increased risk for preterm birth after diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, grade 1 and loop electrosurcigal excision procedure was observed. We also compared both groups to the background population in the Medical Birth Register. For cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, grade 1 patients without loop electrosurcigal excision procedure the risk for preterm birth was not increased (odds ratios 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.76-1.21) whereas for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, grade 1 patients treated with loop electrosurcigal excision procedure the risk for preterm birth was increased (odds ratios 1.45, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.92).
Loop electrosurcigal excision procedure itself increases the risk for preterm birth. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, grade 1 as such does not increase the risk for preterm birth.
在这项基于人群的登记研究中,我们的目的是探讨宫颈上皮内瘤变 1 级和环形电切术与早产之间的关系。
我们的人群由 1997 年至 2009 年间诊断为宫颈上皮内瘤变 1 级的 4759 名妇女及其随后的 3021 次分娩组成,这些分娩通过环形电切术和产次进行分析。使用住院患者登记簿来识别诊断为宫颈上皮内瘤变 1 级的妇女,这些数据与医疗出生登记簿数据相关联。我们计算了 95%置信区间的比值比。
行环形电切术的宫颈上皮内瘤变 1 级患者有 54 例(6.7%)随后早产,而行环形电切术的宫颈上皮内瘤变 1 级患者无早产的有 116 例(5.2%)。这导致比值比为 1.31(95%置信区间为 0.94-1.83)。我们评估了宫颈上皮内瘤变 1 级诊断前后,对行环形电切术(比值比为 1.47,95%置信区间为 1.05-2.06)和未行环形电切术(比值比为 0.90,95%置信区间为 0.71-1.13)的患者的风险。在诊断为宫颈上皮内瘤变 1 级并进行环形电切术后,早产的风险增加。我们还将这两组与医疗出生登记簿中的背景人群进行了比较。对于未行环形电切术的宫颈上皮内瘤变 1 级患者,早产的风险没有增加(比值比为 0.95,95%置信区间为 0.76-1.21),而对于接受环形电切术治疗的宫颈上皮内瘤变 1 级患者,早产的风险增加(比值比为 1.45,95%置信区间为 1.02-1.92)。
环形电切术本身会增加早产的风险。宫颈上皮内瘤变 1 级本身并不会增加早产的风险。