Rabei R, Mathevosian S, Tasse J, Madassery S, Arslan B, Turba U, Ahmed O
1 Chicago Medical School , Rosalind Franklin University , North Chicago, IL , USA.
2 Rush University Medical Center , Chicago, IL , USA.
Br J Radiol. 2018 Feb;91(1083):20170409. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170409. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
To report an initial experience using a primary constrained transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) technique for treating cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites or variceal bleeding.
All patients undergoing primary constrained (n = 9) and conventional (n = 18) TIPS between July 2014 and June 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Preprocedure demographics, Child-Pugh, model for end-stage liver disease and technical variables were recorded. Outcomes measured included technical and clinical success, complications, 30-day mortality, as well as necessity for TIPS revision. Average (SD) and median follow-up was 237 (190) and 226 days.
All constrained and conventional TIPS were technically successful (100%). Clinical success as defined as a reduction or improvement in presenting symptoms was 88.9% (8/9) and 100% (18/18) in the constrained and conventional groups, respectively (p = 1). The average reduction in portosystemic gradient was lower in the constrained group, 6.1 mmHg compared with 10.6 mmHg in the conventional group (p = 0.73). The rate of hepatic encephalopathy following TIPS placement was higher in the conventional group [16.7% (3/18)] compared with 0% in the constrained group (p = 0.52). The percentage of patients requiring TIPS revision was lower in the constrained group, although the results were not significant (11.1 vs 22.2%, p = 0.63).
Primary constrained TIPS is a feasible modification to conventional TIPS with similar technical and clinical success rates. A trend towards a smaller reduction in the portosystemic gradient and need for revision was observed in the constrained group. Advances in knowledge: Primary constrained TIPS allows for greater stepwise control over shunt diameter and may represent an improved technique for patients at risk for hepatic encephalopathy.
报告使用原发性限制性经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)治疗肝硬化难治性腹水或静脉曲张出血患者的初步经验。
回顾性分析2014年7月至2016年6月期间接受原发性限制性(n = 9)和传统(n = 18)TIPS治疗的所有患者。记录术前人口统计学、Child-Pugh评分、终末期肝病模型及技术变量。测量的结果包括技术和临床成功率、并发症、30天死亡率以及TIPS修正的必要性。平均(标准差)和中位随访时间分别为237(190)天和226天。
所有限制性和传统TIPS在技术上均成功(100%)。以症状减轻或改善定义的临床成功率在限制性组和传统组分别为88.9%(8/9)和100%(18/18)(p = 1)。限制性组门体压力梯度的平均降低幅度较低,为6.1 mmHg,而传统组为10.6 mmHg(p = 0.73)。TIPS置入后传统组肝性脑病发生率[16.7%(3/18)]高于限制性组的0%(p = 约0.52)。限制性组需要TIPS修正的患者百分比更低,尽管结果无统计学意义(11.1%对22.2%,p = 0.63)。
原发性限制性TIPS是对传统TIPS的一种可行改良,技术和临床成功率相似。在限制性组中观察到门体压力梯度降低幅度较小及修正需求的趋势。知识进展:原发性限制性TIPS允许对分流直径进行更大程度的逐步控制,可能是一种对有肝性脑病风险患者的改良技术。