Cox Jill
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2017 Nov;63(11):30-43.
Critically ill patients require complex care in a technologically sophisticated environment where they are highly vulnerable to pressure-related injuries. However, pressure injury (PI) development remains a multifactorial phenomenon in critically ill persons; true risk is both pervasive and elusive. The purpose of this comprehensive review of the empirical literature was to examine the risk factors associated with PIs among adult patients admitted to contemporary intensive care units (ICUs). Inclusion criteria stipulated publications were to be peer-reviewed, quantitative studies with a focus on pressure ulcer (PU) risk factors in adult critical care patients published between 2010 and 2016 in which statistical analysis involved multivariate analysis using PU development as the outcome variable. Studies not available in English, those in which the primary focus was on PU prevention or treatment, and those that focused solely on the use of PU risk assessment scales were excluded. A comprehensive review of the OVID and PubMed computerized databases using the search terms pressure ulcer, critical care, intensive care, and risk factors yielded 540 reports; 358 remained after duplicates were eliminated and 28 after the inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied. Following examination, 16 studies were suitable for inclusion. A total of 43 risk factors emerged. Of those, 7 were identified in 3 or more studies in multivariate regression analysis; these included age, prolonged ICU admission, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, hypotension, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and vasopressor administration. To facilitate results interpretation, risk factors from multivariate analyses were grouped in 6 broad categories: demographic/patient characteristics, comorbidities, intrinsic factors, iatrogenic/care factors, PI risk assessment scales, and severity of illness/mortality risk. The shared attribute of the 7 risk factors identified was they are all potentially nonmodifiable. Advancing the science regarding the pathogenesis of PI development is imperative when trying to better understand unavoidable pressure-related injuries. The need for large multisite studies and studies using large datasets capable of validating risk factors unique to this population persists. Additionally, the need for enhanced PI risk quantification for adult ICU patients remains.
重症患者需要在技术复杂的环境中接受复杂护理,在这种环境下,他们极易受到与压力相关的损伤。然而,在重症患者中,压力性损伤(PI)的发生仍然是一个多因素现象;真正的风险既普遍存在又难以捉摸。这篇对实证文献的全面综述的目的是研究当代重症监护病房(ICU)成年患者中与PI相关的风险因素。纳入标准规定,出版物需经过同行评审,是定量研究,重点关注2010年至2016年期间发表的成年重症监护患者压力性溃疡(PU)风险因素,其中统计分析涉及以PU发生为结果变量的多变量分析。非英文研究、主要关注PU预防或治疗的研究以及仅关注PU风险评估量表使用的研究均被排除。使用“压力性溃疡”“重症监护”“强化护理”和“风险因素”等检索词对OVID和PubMed计算机数据库进行全面检索,共得到540篇报告;剔除重复项后剩下358篇,应用纳入/排除标准后剩下28篇。经过审查,16项研究适合纳入。总共出现了43个风险因素。其中,7个在多变量回归分析的3项或更多研究中被确定;这些因素包括年龄、ICU住院时间延长、糖尿病、心血管疾病、低血压、机械通气时间延长和血管加压药的使用。为便于结果解释,多变量分析中的风险因素被归为6大类:人口统计学/患者特征、合并症、内在因素、医源性/护理因素、PI风险评估量表以及疾病严重程度/死亡风险。所确定的7个风险因素的共同属性是它们都可能是不可改变的。在试图更好地理解不可避免的与压力相关的损伤时,推进关于PI发生机制的科学研究势在必行。仍然需要进行大型多中心研究以及使用能够验证该人群独特风险因素的大型数据集的研究。此外,提高成年ICU患者PI风险量化的需求依然存在。