Pek Jen Heng, Ong Gene Yong-Kwang
From the Children's Emergency, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018 Dec;34(12):852-856. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001355.
Resuscitation of critically ill children can be chaotic, and emergency airway management is often fraught with difficulties. This study aimed to characterize the Singaporean landscape of tracheal intubation in a pediatric emergency unit, placing emphasis on safety outcomes, procedural process of care, and provider training.
A retrospective review of all cases presented to the KK Women's and Children's Hospital from January 2009 to December 2013 with intubation carried out within the pediatric emergency unit was done. Medical records were accessed for data collection, and the information was subsequently used for analysis.
A total of 207 intubations were carried out in the pediatric emergency unit. The median age was 4 years (interquartile range, 11 months to 8 years). Oral tracheal intubation with the combination of sedation and paralysis was the main approach. Atropine was used for pretreatment in 156 cases (75.4%). Midazolam was the most commonly used induction agent, and succinylcholine was the most commonly used the paralytic agent. Intubation was achieved on the first attempt in 175 cases (84.5%). Postintubation sedation was initiated in 94 cases (45.4%). Postintubation paralysis was initiated in 50 cases (24.2%). Postintubation analgesia was initiated in 13 cases (6.3%). Twenty emergency intubations (9.7%) were associated with at least 1 tracheal intubation adverse event, with 7 cases (3.4%) having severe tracheal intubation adverse events. In 1 case (0.5%), the patient died within the pediatric emergency unit, and 27 patients (13.0%) did not survive to discharge from the hospital.
All tracheal intubations performed were successful. Variance still exists in tracheal intubation practice. Further elucidation of patient, practice, and provider factors will aid development of a bundle quality improvement intervention directed at addressing these factors.
危重症儿童的复苏过程可能会很混乱,紧急气道管理往往充满困难。本研究旨在描述新加坡儿科急诊科气管插管的情况,重点关注安全结果、护理程序过程和提供者培训。
对2009年1月至2013年12月在KK妇女儿童医院儿科急诊科进行插管的所有病例进行回顾性研究。查阅病历以收集数据,随后将这些信息用于分析。
儿科急诊科共进行了207次气管插管。中位年龄为4岁(四分位间距,11个月至8岁)。镇静和肌松联合的经口气管插管是主要方法。156例(75.4%)使用阿托品进行预处理。咪达唑仑是最常用的诱导剂,琥珀酰胆碱是最常用的肌松剂。175例(84.5%)首次尝试即成功插管。94例(45.4%)开始进行插管后镇静。50例(24.2%)开始进行插管后肌松。13例(6.3%)开始进行插管后镇痛。20次紧急插管(9.7%)与至少1次气管插管不良事件相关,7例(3.4%)发生严重气管插管不良事件。1例(0.5%)患者在儿科急诊科死亡,27例(13.0%)患者未存活至出院。
所有实施的气管插管均成功。气管插管操作仍存在差异。进一步阐明患者、操作和提供者因素将有助于制定针对这些因素的综合质量改进干预措施。