• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两阶段假体乳房重建:胸前位与部分胸肌下技术的比较

Two-Stage Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison Between Prepectoral and Partial Subpectoral Techniques.

作者信息

Nahabedian Maurice Y, Cocilovo Costanza

机构信息

Washington, DC; and Falls Church, VA.

From the Georgetown University Hospital and Inova Fairfax Hospital.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec;140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):22S-30S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004047.

DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000004047
PMID:29166344
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prosthetic breast reconstruction with prepectoral placement may confer clinical advantages compared with subpectoral placement. The purpose of this study was to assess and compare clinical outcomes following 2-stage reconstruction following prepectoral and partial subpectoral placement of tissue expanders and implants.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 39 (prepectoral) and 50 (partial subpectoral) patients was completed. Acellular dermal matrix was used in all patients. Mean age was 50.4 and 49.2 years, respectively. Body mass index (BMI) > 30 was noted in 15.4% of prepectoral and 18% of partial subpectoral patients. Radiation therapy was delivered to 38.5% of prepectoral patients and to 22% of partial subpectoral patients. Mean follow-up was 8.7 and 13 months for the prepectoral cohort and partial subpectoral cohorts.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients having at least 1 adverse event was 20.5% in the prepectoral and 22% in the partial subpectoral cohorts. The incidence of surgical-site infection and seroma was 8.1% and 4.8%, respectively, for the prepectoral cohort and 4.8% and 2.4%, respectively, for the partial subpectoral cohorts. Device explantation was 6.5% for the prepectoral and 7.2% for the partial subpectoral patients. Explantation did not occur in patients who had radiation or who had a BMI > 30. Four patients (6 breasts-7.2%) required conversion from partial subpectoral to prepectoral because of animation deformity.

CONCLUSIONS

Prepectoral reconstruction is a viable alternative to partial subpectoral reconstruction. Proper patient selection is an important variable. Prepectoral reconstruction can be safely performed in patients with a BMI < 40 and in patients having postmastectomy radiation therapy.

摘要

背景

与胸肌下植入相比,胸前植入进行乳房假体再造可能具有临床优势。本研究的目的是评估和比较在胸前和部分胸肌下植入组织扩张器和植入物后进行两阶段再造的临床结果。

方法

对39例(胸前植入)和50例(部分胸肌下植入)患者进行了回顾性研究。所有患者均使用了脱细胞真皮基质。平均年龄分别为50.4岁和49.2岁。胸前植入患者中有15.4%、部分胸肌下植入患者中有18%的体重指数(BMI)>30。38.5%的胸前植入患者和22%的部分胸肌下植入患者接受了放射治疗。胸前植入队列和部分胸肌下植入队列的平均随访时间分别为8.7个月和13个月。

结果

胸前植入队列中至少发生1次不良事件的患者百分比为20.5%,部分胸肌下植入队列中为22%。胸前植入队列的手术部位感染和血清肿发生率分别为8.1%和4.8%,部分胸肌下植入队列分别为4.8%和2.4%。胸前植入患者的装置取出率为6.5%,部分胸肌下植入患者为7.2%。接受放疗或BMI>30的患者未发生装置取出。4例患者(6侧乳房,7.2%)因动态畸形需要从部分胸肌下植入转换为胸前植入。

结论

胸前再造是部分胸肌下再造的可行替代方案。正确的患者选择是一个重要变量。BMI<40的患者以及乳房切除术后接受放疗的患者可以安全地进行胸前再造。

相似文献

1
Two-Stage Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison Between Prepectoral and Partial Subpectoral Techniques.两阶段假体乳房重建:胸前位与部分胸肌下技术的比较
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec;140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):22S-30S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004047.
2
Impact of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy in Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.保乳术后放疗对胸肌前与胸肌后假体植入式乳房重建的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;25(10):2899-2908. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6602-7. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
3
Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct to Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction.胸大肌前与胸大肌下入路即刻乳房重建的比较。
Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Mar;84(3):263-270. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002059.
4
Acellular Dermal Matrix-sparing Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Including Cost Analysis.脱细胞真皮基质保留的直接置管胸肌前置乳房重建:包括成本分析的对比研究。
Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Feb;84(2):139-143. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001997.
5
Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Without the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix: A 3-Year Review.胸肌前乳房重建术,无需使用脱细胞真皮基质:3 年回顾。
Ann Plast Surg. 2022 May 1;88(3 Suppl 3):S205-S208. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003188.
6
Two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction with latissimus flap: Prepectoral versus subpectoral approach.带蒂背阔肌皮瓣的两阶段假体乳房再造:胸肌前与胸肌后入路比较。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020 Mar;73(3):501-506. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.10.021. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
7
The Impact of Premastectomy Versus Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy on Outcomes in Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.保乳术与乳房切除术术后放疗对胸肌前假体植入式乳房再造术结局的影响。
Ann Plast Surg. 2021 Jul 1;87(1s Suppl 1):S21-S27. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002801.
8
Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.胸肌前置假体植入并用猪脱细胞真皮基质完全覆盖:保留乳头的乳房切除术后即刻乳房重建中一种新的假体直接植入技术。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015 Feb;68(2):162-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.10.012. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
9
Examination of Outcome Disparities in Reports of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经胸肌前和胸肌下入路直接置埋乳房重建术后结局差异的报告研究:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Plast Surg. 2023 May 1;90(5):506-515. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003524. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
10
Reducing Expansion Visits in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Expander Placement.即刻乳房重建中减少扩张期就诊次数:胸肌前与胸肌下扩张器放置的对比研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Aug;144(2):276-286. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005791.

引用本文的文献

1
Scapular dyskinesis after breast reconstruction surgery for breast cancer: a retrospective clinical analysis on 67 patients.乳腺癌乳房重建术后肩胛运动障碍:67例患者的回顾性临床分析
Musculoskelet Surg. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1007/s12306-025-00904-x.
2
Risk factor analysis and clinical experience of treating red breast syndrome in acellular dermal matrix and implant-based breast reconstruction.脱细胞真皮基质和植入物乳房重建中治疗红色乳房综合征的危险因素分析及临床经验
Gland Surg. 2025 Mar 31;14(3):317-326. doi: 10.21037/gs-2024-542. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
3
Radiological Insights into Acellular Dermal Matrix Integration in Post-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Implications for Cancer Patient Management.
乳房切除术后乳房重建中脱细胞真皮基质整合的影像学见解:对癌症患者管理的启示。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 10;17(6):933. doi: 10.3390/cancers17060933.
4
Prognosis of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy Flap Necrosis: Predictors of Failure and Salvage.乳房切除术后皮瓣坏死的植入式乳房重建预后:失败和挽救的预测因素
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Jun;49(11):3081-3091. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-04695-1. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
5
The Evolution of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Innovations, Trends, and Future Directions.基于植入物的乳房重建的演变:创新、趋势与未来方向。
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 5;13(23):7407. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237407.
6
Impact of the Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Assessment Score on Expander-Based Reconstruction Success.胸前区乳房重建评估评分对基于扩张器的重建成功率的影响。
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 28;13(21):6466. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216466.
7
Outcomes of ADM-Assisted Implant-based Breast Reconstructions According to Division Types of the Pectoralis Major Muscle.根据胸大肌划分类型的脱细胞真皮基质辅助的乳房植入重建效果
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Mar;49(5):1314-1326. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04425-z. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
8
Comparative complications of prepectoral versus subpectoral breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis.乳腺癌患者胸前区与胸肌下乳房重建的比较并发症:一项荟萃分析。
Front Oncol. 2024 Aug 26;14:1439293. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1439293. eCollection 2024.
9
Comparing outcomes of prepectoral, partial muscle-splitting subpectoral, and dual-plane subpectoral direct-to-implant reconstruction: implant upward migration and the pectoralis muscle.胸前、部分肌肉劈开胸大肌下及双平面胸大肌下直接植入乳房重建的效果比较:假体向上移位与胸大肌
Gland Surg. 2024 Jun 30;13(6):852-863. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-45. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
10
A Single-center Comparison of Surgical Outcomes following Prepectoral and Subpectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.基于胸大肌前和胸大肌下植入物的乳房重建术后手术结果的单中心比较
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Jun 10;12(6):e5880. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005880. eCollection 2024 Jun.