1Department of Medical Microbiology & Infection Control,VU University Medical Center,Amsterdam,Netherlands.
3Division Office,VU University Medical Center,Amsterdam,Netherlands.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Dec;38(12):1435-1440. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.233. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
BACKGROUND The VU University Medical Center, a tertiary-care hospital in the Netherlands, has adopted a dress code based on national guidelines. It includes uniforms provided by the hospital and a 'bare-below-the-elbow' policy for all healthcare workers (HCWs) in direct patient care. Because compliance was poor, we sought to improve adherence by interventions targeted at the main causes of noncompliance. OBJECTIVE To measure compliance with the dress code, to assess causes of noncompliance and to assess whether a behavioral approach (combing a nominal group technique with participatory action) is effective in improving compliance METHODS Between March 2014 and June 2016, a total of 1,920 HCWs were observed in hospital hallways for adherence to the policy, at baseline, and at follow-up measurements. Based on the outcome of the baseline measurement, a nominal group technique was applied to assess causes of noncompliance. The causes revealed served as input for interventions that were developed, prioritized, and tailored to specific groups of HCWs and specific departments through participatory action. RESULTS We identified lack of knowledge, lack of facilities, and negative attitudes as the main causes of noncompliance. The importance of each cause varied for different groups of HCWs. Tailored interventions targeted at these causes increased overall compliance by 39.6% (95% CI, 31.7-47.5). CONCLUSION The combination of a nominal group technique and participatory action approach is an effective method to increase and sustain compliance with hospital dress code. This combined approach may also be useful to improve adherence to other guidelines. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:1435-1440.
荷兰的一家三级保健医院 VU 大学医学中心采用了基于国家指南的着装规范。它包括医院提供的制服和所有直接护理患者的医疗保健工作者(HCW)的“肘下裸露”政策。由于合规性较差,我们试图通过针对主要不合规原因的干预措施来提高合规性。
测量着装规范的遵守情况,评估不合规的原因,并评估行为方法(将名义群体技术与参与性行动相结合)是否有效提高合规性。
在 2014 年 3 月至 2016 年 6 月期间,在基线和随访测量时,共有 1920 名 HCW 在医院走廊中观察遵守政策的情况。基于基线测量的结果,应用名义群体技术评估不合规的原因。揭示的原因作为干预措施的输入,这些干预措施通过参与性行动开发、优先排序和针对特定的 HCW 群体和特定部门进行定制。
我们发现缺乏知识、缺乏设施和负面态度是不合规的主要原因。每个原因对不同群体的 HCW 的重要性不同。针对这些原因的定制干预措施使总体合规性提高了 39.6%(95%CI,31.7-47.5)。
名义群体技术和参与性行动方法的结合是提高和维持医院着装规范合规性的有效方法。这种联合方法也可能有助于提高对其他指南的遵守。感染控制与医院流行病学 2017;38:1435-1440。