Cardiovascular Stress Response Laboratory, School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University , Kingston, Ontario , Canada.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2018 Mar 1;314(3):H508-H520. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00534.2017. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
Investigations of human conduit artery endothelial function via flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) have largely been restricted to the reactive hyperemia (RH) technique, wherein a transient increase in shear stress after the release of limb occlusion stimulates upstream conduit artery vasodilation (RH-FMD). FMD can also be assessed in response to sustained increases in shear stress [sustained stimulus (SS)-FMD], most often created with limb heating or exercise. Exercise in particular creates a physiologically relevant stimulus because shear stress increases, and FMD occurs, during typical day-to-day activity. Several studies have identified that various conditions and acute interventions have a disparate impact on RH-FMD versus SS-FMD, sometimes with only the latter demonstrating impairment. Indeed, evidence suggests that transient (RH) and sustained (SS) shear stress stimuli may be transduced via different signaling pathways, and, as such, SS-FMD and RH-FMD appear to offer unique insights regarding endothelial function. The present review describes the techniques used to assess SS-FMD and summarizes the evidence regarding 1) SS-FMD as an index of endothelial function in humans, highlighting comparisons with RH-FMD, and 2) potential differences in shear stress transduction and vasodilator production stimulated by transient versus sustained shear stress stimuli. The evidence suggests that SS-FMD is a useful tool to assess endothelial function and that further research is required to characterize the mechanisms involved and its association with long-term cardiovascular outcomes. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Sustained increases in peripheral conduit artery shear stress, created via distal skin heating or exercise, provide a physiologically relevant stimulus for flow-mediated dilation (FMD). Sustained stimulus FMD and FMD stimulated by transient, reactive hyperemia-induced increases in shear stress provide distinct assessments of conduit artery endothelial function.
通过血流介导的舒张(FMD)对人体管道动脉内皮功能的研究主要局限于反应性充血(RH)技术,其中在肢体闭塞解除后,剪切应力的短暂增加会刺激上游管道动脉舒张(RH-FMD)。也可以通过持续增加剪切应力来评估 FMD[持续刺激(SS)-FMD],通常通过肢体加热或运动来实现。运动尤其可以创造一个与生理相关的刺激,因为剪切应力增加,并且在日常活动中会发生 FMD。多项研究表明,各种条件和急性干预措施对 RH-FMD 和 SS-FMD 的影响不同,有时只有后者显示出损伤。事实上,有证据表明,短暂(RH)和持续(SS)剪切应力刺激可能通过不同的信号通路传递,因此,SS-FMD 和 RH-FMD 似乎提供了关于内皮功能的独特见解。本综述描述了评估 SS-FMD 的技术,并总结了以下方面的证据:1)SS-FMD 作为人类内皮功能的指标,重点比较了 RH-FMD;2)通过短暂和持续的剪切应力刺激,剪切应力传递和血管舒张剂产生的潜在差异。证据表明,SS-FMD 是评估内皮功能的有用工具,需要进一步研究来描述涉及的机制及其与长期心血管结局的关系。新的和值得注意的是,通过远端皮肤加热或运动产生的外周管道动脉剪切应力的持续增加,为血流介导的扩张(FMD)提供了一个与生理相关的刺激。通过短暂的反应性充血诱导的剪切应力增加和持续刺激引起的 FMD 提供了对管道动脉内皮功能的不同评估。