Suppr超能文献

婴儿期神经运动技能的发展与手偏好

The development of neuromotor skills and hand preference during infancy.

作者信息

Campbell Julie M, Marcinowski Emily C, Michel George F

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois.

Department of Physical Therapy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.

出版信息

Dev Psychobiol. 2018 Mar;60(2):165-175. doi: 10.1002/dev.21591. Epub 2017 Nov 23.

Abstract

Assessing infant handedness has been controversial. Different assessment techniques and theoretical approaches produce different results. Evidence from a dynamic systems perspective showed that the development of postural control during infancy affects the expression of an infant's handedness. However, others found that developmental changes in postural control influenced the amount of symmetrical (bimanual) reaching during infancy, but not hand preference. Since most studies of infant handedness use age to assess development, perhaps measures of an infant's developing neuromotor control, irrespective of age, would better predict changes in an infant's hand preference. To assess neuromotor development, items from [Touwen's (1976) Neurological development in infancy. Lavenham, Suffolk: The Lavenham Press, LTD]. "Group III" indices were used. These items assess developmental changes in neuromotor abilities throughout the 6-14-month age period. Hand preference for acquiring objects was measured during these same months. Group Based Trajectory Models (GBTM) of 380 infants identified four different groups of infants according to the trajectory of the development of their hand preferences (32% Early Right, 12% Early Left, 25% Late Right, 30% No Preference). A multilevel model was used to compare these four developmental trajectories according to age and neuromotor development. Age, not neuromotor development, is a better predictor of differences in developmental trajectories of the four hand preference groups. However, Late Right infants are significantly less developed at 6 months than No Preference, Early Right and Left infants and both Early Right and Left infants are most advanced at 6 months. All groups exhibit similar rates of neuromotor development indicating no "catch-up" by the Late Right infants. Thus, any assessment of infant handedness will incorporate necessarily four groups of infants with differently developing hand preferences and neuromotor abilities.

摘要

评估婴儿的用手偏好一直存在争议。不同的评估技术和理论方法会产生不同的结果。动态系统视角的证据表明,婴儿期姿势控制的发展会影响婴儿用手偏好的表现。然而,其他人发现姿势控制的发育变化会影响婴儿期对称(双手)够物的数量,但不影响用手偏好。由于大多数关于婴儿用手偏好的研究使用年龄来评估发育情况,或许无论年龄大小,测量婴儿正在发育的神经运动控制能力,能更好地预测婴儿用手偏好的变化。为了评估神经运动发育,采用了[图温(1976年)《婴儿期的神经发育》。萨福克郡拉文纳姆:拉文纳姆出版社有限公司]中“第三组”的指标。这些指标评估了6至14个月龄期间神经运动能力的发育变化。在同一时期测量了获取物体时的用手偏好。基于群体轨迹模型(GBTM)对380名婴儿进行分析,根据他们用手偏好的发展轨迹确定了四组不同的婴儿(32%早期惯用右手,12%早期惯用左手,25%晚期惯用右手,30%无偏好)。使用多层次模型根据年龄和神经运动发育情况比较这四种发育轨迹。年龄而非神经运动发育,是四个用手偏好组发育轨迹差异的更好预测指标。然而,晚期惯用右手的婴儿在6个月时的发育明显不如无偏好、早期惯用右手和左手的婴儿,而早期惯用右手和左手的婴儿在6个月时发育最为超前。所有组的神经运动发育速度相似,这表明晚期惯用右手的婴儿没有“追赶”现象。因此,任何对婴儿用手偏好的评估都必然会纳入四组用手偏好和神经运动能力发展不同的婴儿。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验