Department of Health Policy Science, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Relief Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
J Dermatol. 2018 Feb;45(2):165-174. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.14133. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
Using large-scale receipt data, we analyzed the differences in the prescription of drugs and their costs between dermatology and pediatrics in the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) in children. Between August 2010 and July 2011, 50 706 patients were diagnosed as having AD, and the data of 21 075 (15 257 dermatology, 5818 pediatric) patients aged 0-14 years were included in this study. The use of classes I (strongest), II (very strong), and III (strong) topical corticosteroids and tacrolimus was significantly higher in dermatology than in pediatrics (class I, 2.88% vs 0.76%; class II, 27.68% vs 8.32%; class III, 52.53% vs 39.88%; tacrolimus, 5.05% vs 2.82%; all P < 0.05). Although total drug costs were higher in dermatology than in pediatrics, mean drug costs per person were significantly higher in pediatrics. Moisturizers and protective agents had the highest cost (~ ¥690 million). The introduction rate of generic drugs was low at 8.3% among classes I-V. The introduction rate of moisturizers and protective agents, for which costs were the highest, was approximately 9%. The prescription of generic classes II-V topical corticosteroids and moisturizers and protective agents was also significantly higher in dermatology than in pediatrics (P < 0.05). Among patients younger than 2 years, 4405 received drugs for AD; classes I and II topical corticosteroids and tacrolimus (against the guidelines) were administrated in 35 (0.8%), 474 (10.8%) and 29 patients (0.7%), respectively. The introduction of generic drugs is still low, and the use of generic moisturizers and protective agents should be addressed further.
利用大规模收据数据,我们分析了皮肤科和儿科在治疗儿童特应性皮炎(AD)中药物处方和费用的差异。2010 年 8 月至 2011 年 7 月期间,共有 50706 例患者被诊断为 AD,其中 21075 例(15257 例皮肤科,5818 例儿科)0-14 岁患者的数据纳入本研究。与儿科相比,皮肤科中 I 类(最强)、II 类(非常强)和 III 类(强)外用皮质类固醇和他克莫司的使用率明显更高(I 类:2.88%比 0.76%;II 类:27.68%比 8.32%;III 类:52.53%比 39.88%;他克莫司:5.05%比 2.82%;均 P<0.05)。尽管皮肤科的总药物费用高于儿科,但儿科的人均药物费用明显更高。保湿剂和保护剂的费用最高(约 6.9 亿日元)。I-V 类药物的仿制药引入率仅为 8.3%。费用最高的保湿剂和保护剂的仿制药引入率约为 9%。皮肤科中 II-V 类外用皮质类固醇和保湿剂和保护剂的仿制药处方也明显高于儿科(P<0.05)。在 2 岁以下的患者中,有 4405 例接受了 AD 药物治疗;有 35 例(0.8%)、474 例(10.8%)和 29 例(0.7%)患者分别使用了 I 类和 II 类外用皮质类固醇和他克莫司(不符合指南)。仿制药的引入率仍然较低,应进一步解决仿制药保湿剂和保护剂的使用问题。