Gore J M, Corrao J M, Goldberg R J, Ball S P, Weiner B H, Aghababian R V, Dalen J E
Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester 01655.
Arch Intern Med. 1989 Feb;149(2):353-5.
The transfer of patients with acute myocardial infarction from community hospitals to tertiary care facilities for further intervention has become increasingly more frequent due to the emerging role of thrombolytic therapy and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. To assess the feasibility and safety of early transfer, a prospective analysis of 57 patients who were transported by ground ambulance or helicopter to the University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, for acute intervention during the early hours of myocardial infarction was conducted. Before transport, the majority (46 [81%]) of patients were having chest discomfort, 13 (23%) were hypotensive, and 12 (21%) were electrically unstable (defined as high-grade ventricular ectopia or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia). During transport, the majority (41 [72%]) continued to have some chest discomfort; however, only two (4%) remained hypotensive. Although five patients (9%) were electrically unstable during transport, the instability was considered noncritical. The distance traveled or the mode of transportation did not adversely impact on these clinical complications. All patients survived transport, and 53 patients (93%) were eventually discharged from the receiving hospital.
由于溶栓治疗和经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术的作用日益凸显,急性心肌梗死患者从社区医院转至三级医疗机构进行进一步干预的情况越来越频繁。为评估早期转运的可行性和安全性,我们对57例在心肌梗死早期数小时内通过地面救护车或直升机转运至伍斯特市马萨诸塞大学医学中心进行急性干预的患者进行了前瞻性分析。转运前,大多数患者(46例[81%])有胸部不适,13例(23%)血压过低,12例(21%)电不稳定(定义为高级别室性早搏或非持续性室性心动过速)。转运期间,大多数患者(41例[72%])仍有一些胸部不适;然而,只有2例(4%)血压仍过低。尽管有5例患者(9%)在转运期间电不稳定,但这种不稳定被认为不严重。转运距离或运输方式并未对这些临床并发症产生不利影响。所有患者均安全度过转运过程,53例患者(93%)最终从接收医院出院。