• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣植入术相对于外科主动脉瓣置换术在女性患者中具有生存优势:包括 3758 例患者的随机对照试验的性别亚组的荟萃分析。

Female-specific survival advantage from transcatheter aortic valve implantation over surgical aortic valve replacement: Meta-analysis of the gender subgroups of randomised controlled trials including 3758 patients.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK; Cardiology Department, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.

Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2018 Jan 1;250:66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.047.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.047
PMID:29169764
Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for severe aortic stenosis (AS) is the first area of interventional cardiology where women are treated as often as men. In this analysis of the gender specific results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TAVI with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) we aimed to determine whether gender affects the survival comparison between TAVI and SAVR. We identified all RCTs comparing TAVI versus SAVR for severe AS and reporting 1 and/or 2year survival. Summary odds ratios (ORs) were obtained using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q statistic and I. Four RCTs met the criteria, totalling 3758 patients, 1706 women and 2052 men. Amongst females, TAVI recipients had a significantly lower mortality than SAVR recipients, at 1year (OR 0.68; 95%CI 0.50 to 0.94) and at 2years (OR 0.74; 95%CI 0.58 to 0.95). Amongst males there was no difference in mortality between TAVI and SAVR, at 1year (OR 1.09; 95%CI 0.86 to 1.39) or 2years (OR 1.05; 95%CI 0.85 to 1.3). The difference in treatment effect between genders was significant at both 1year (p=0.02) and 2years (p=0.04). In women TAVI has a 26 to 31% lower mortality odds than SAVR. In men, there is no difference in mortality between TAVI and SAVR.

摘要

经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)是介入心脏病学中第一个女性接受治疗的比例与男性相当的领域。在这项比较 TAVI 与外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)的随机对照试验(RCT)的性别特异性结果分析中,我们旨在确定性别是否影响 TAVI 和 SAVR 之间的生存比较。我们确定了所有比较 TAVI 与 SAVR 治疗严重 AS 并报告 1 年和/或 2 年生存率的 RCT。使用随机效应模型获得汇总优势比(OR)。使用 Q 统计量和 I 评估异质性。四项 RCT 符合标准,共有 3758 名患者,1706 名女性和 2052 名男性。在女性中,TAVI 组患者的死亡率明显低于 SAVR 组,1 年时(OR 0.68;95%CI 0.50 至 0.94)和 2 年时(OR 0.74;95%CI 0.58 至 0.95)。在男性中,1 年时(OR 1.09;95%CI 0.86 至 1.39)和 2 年时(OR 1.05;95%CI 0.85 至 1.3),TAVI 和 SAVR 之间的死亡率无差异。性别之间治疗效果的差异在 1 年(p=0.02)和 2 年(p=0.04)时均具有统计学意义。在女性中,TAVI 的死亡率比 SAVR 低 26%至 31%。在男性中,TAVI 和 SAVR 之间的死亡率无差异。

相似文献

1
Female-specific survival advantage from transcatheter aortic valve implantation over surgical aortic valve replacement: Meta-analysis of the gender subgroups of randomised controlled trials including 3758 patients.经导管主动脉瓣植入术相对于外科主动脉瓣置换术在女性患者中具有生存优势:包括 3758 例患者的随机对照试验的性别亚组的荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Jan 1;250:66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.047.
2
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of severe aortic stenosis: comparison of results from randomized controlled trials and real-world data.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄:随机对照试验和真实世界数据结果比较。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Jun 1;35(3):346-367. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0288.
3
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of severe aortic stenosis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄的比较:随机试验的荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Dec 14;37(47):3503-3512. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw225. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
4
Worse survival after transcatheter aortic valve implantation than surgical aortic valve replacement: A meta-analysis of observational studies with a propensity-score analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后生存率低于外科主动脉瓣置换术:一项倾向评分分析的观察性研究的荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 1;220:320-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.261. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
5
A meta-analysis of ≥5-year mortality after transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术后≥5年死亡率的荟萃分析。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2020 Feb;61(1):107-116. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.19.11030-0. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
6
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的疗效比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 6;11(12):e054222. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054222.
7
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in people with low surgical risk.对于手术风险较低的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者,经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 20;12(12):CD013319. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013319.pub2.
8
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: an updated meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗症状性重度主动脉瓣狭窄的比较:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Oct 7;40(38):3143-3153. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz275.
9
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With a Focus on Outcomes by Sex.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较:一项侧重于性别结局的更新系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heart Lung Circ. 2021 Jan;30(1):86-99. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.05.112. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
10
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low and intermediate risk: A risk specific meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与低、中度风险患者外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较:随机对照试验的风险特异性荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 24;14(9):e0221922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221922. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Aortic Stenosis and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Women.了解女性主动脉瓣狭窄及经导管主动脉瓣置换术
Struct Heart. 2025 May 30;9(7):100666. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2025.100666. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Sex-Associated Disparities in Surgical and Percutaneous Management of Aortic Stenosis With Severe Features: Retrospective Analysis From the National Readmission Database.具有严重特征的主动脉瓣狭窄的手术和经皮治疗中的性别差异:来自国家再入院数据库的回顾性分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 20;14(10):e038463. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.038463. Epub 2025 May 15.
3
Sex-related differences in patient characteristics, practice patterns and outcomes after bioprosthetic and mechanical aortic valve replacement.
生物瓣和机械瓣主动脉瓣置换术后患者特征、治疗模式及结局的性别差异
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025 May 6;40(5). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaf110.
4
Sex-related disparities in aortic stenosis from disease awareness to treatment: a state-of-the-art review.从疾病认知到治疗的主动脉瓣狭窄中的性别差异:最新综述
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Sep 30;16(9):6308-6319. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-406. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
5
The influence of gender on outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation.性别对经导管主动脉瓣植入术后结局的影响。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jul 17;11:1417430. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1417430. eCollection 2024.
6
Unique Aspects of Women's Valvular Heart Diseases: Impact for Diagnosis and Treatment.女性心脏瓣膜病的独特方面:对诊断和治疗的影响。
CJC Open. 2023 Nov 4;6(2Part B):503-516. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.10.017. eCollection 2024 Feb.
7
Regional variation and temporal trends in transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in Switzerland: A population-based small area analysis.瑞士经导管主动脉瓣置换术和外科主动脉瓣置换术的区域差异和时间趋势:基于人群的小区域分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 8;19(1):e0296055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296055. eCollection 2024.
8
Transcatheter Valve Replacement in Patients with Aortic Valve Stenosis: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis with Different Populations.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄患者:不同人群的系统评价和荟萃分析概述。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023 Jun;120(7):e20220701. doi: 10.36660/abc.20220701.
9
Under-representation of Women as Proceduralists and Patients in TAVR and TMVr Procedures: Data, Implications and Proposed Solutions.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)和经导管二尖瓣修复术(TMVr)中女性作为手术操作者和患者的代表性不足:数据、影响及建议解决方案
Eur Cardiol. 2022 Dec 19;17:e27. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2022.33. eCollection 2022 Feb.
10
Treatment of Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis: Impact of Patient Sex and Life Expectancy on Treatment Choice.重度主动脉瓣狭窄的治疗:患者性别和预期寿命对治疗选择的影响。
Eur Cardiol. 2022 Dec 6;17:e25. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2022.31. eCollection 2022 Feb.