Nasser Helen M, Lafferty Danielle S, Lesser Ellen N, Bacharach Sam Z, Calu Donna J
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2018 Jan;147:35-45. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
Previously established individual differences in appetitive approach and devaluation sensitivity observed in goal- and sign-trackers may be attributed to differences in the acquisition, modification, or use of associative information in basolateral amygdala (BLA) pathways. Here, we sought to determine the extent to which communication of associative information between BLA and anterior portions of insular cortex (IC) supports ongoing Pavlovian conditioned approach behaviors in sign- and goal-tracking rats, in the absence of manipulations to outcome value. We hypothesized that the BLA mediates goal-, but not sign- tracking approach through interactions with the IC, a brain region involved in supporting flexible behavior. We first trained rats in Pavlovian lever autoshaping to determine their sign- or goal-tracking tendency. During alternating test sessions, we gave unilateral intracranial injections of vehicle or a cocktail of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor agonists, baclofen and muscimol, unilaterally into the BLA and contralaterally or ipsilaterally into the IC prior to reinforced lever autoshaping sessions. Consistent with our hypothesis we found that contralateral inactivation of BLA and IC increased the latency to approach the food cup and decreased the number of food cup contacts in goal-trackers. While contralateral inactivation of BLA and IC did not affect the total number of lever contacts in sign-trackers, this manipulation increased the latency to approach the lever. Ipsilateral inactivation of BLA and IC did not impact approach behaviors in Pavlovian lever autoshaping. These findings, contrary to our hypothesis, suggest that communication between BLA and IC maintains a representation of initially learned appetitive associations that commonly support the initiation of Pavlovian conditioned approach behavior regardless of whether it is directed at the cue or the location of reward delivery.
先前在目标追踪者和信号追踪者中观察到的在欲望性趋近和贬值敏感性方面已确定的个体差异,可能归因于基底外侧杏仁核(BLA)通路中联想信息的获取、修改或使用方面的差异。在这里,我们试图确定在不操纵结果价值的情况下,BLA与岛叶皮质(IC)前部之间的联想信息交流在多大程度上支持信号追踪和目标追踪大鼠中正在进行的巴甫洛夫条件性趋近行为。我们假设BLA通过与IC(一个参与支持灵活行为的脑区)的相互作用来介导目标追踪趋近,而不是信号追踪趋近。我们首先训练大鼠进行巴甫洛夫杠杆自动成型,以确定它们的信号追踪或目标追踪倾向。在交替的测试阶段,我们在强化杠杆自动成型阶段之前,向BLA单侧颅内注射载体或γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)受体激动剂巴氯芬和蝇蕈醇的混合物,对侧或同侧注射到IC中。与我们的假设一致,我们发现BLA和IC的对侧失活增加了目标追踪者接近食物杯的潜伏期,并减少了与食物杯接触的次数。虽然BLA和IC的对侧失活不影响信号追踪者杠杆接触的总数,但这种操作增加了接近杠杆的潜伏期。BLA和IC的同侧失活在巴甫洛夫杠杆自动成型中不影响趋近行为。与我们的假设相反,这些发现表明,BLA和IC之间的交流维持了最初习得的欲望性联想的表征,这些联想通常支持巴甫洛夫条件性趋近行为的启动,无论它是针对线索还是奖励发放的位置。