da Silva Stephanie P, Williams April Michele
1Columbus State University, 4225 University Avenue, Columbus, GA 31907 USA.
2Rollins College, 1000 Holt Avenue - 2791, Winter Park, FL 32789-4499 USA.
Perspect Behav Sci. 2019 Nov 25;43(1):57-103. doi: 10.1007/s40614-019-00228-9. eCollection 2020 Mar.
Stimulus-stimulus pairing (SSP) is a procedure used by behavior analysis practitioners that capitalizes on respondent conditioning processes to elicit vocalizations. These procedures usually are implemented only after other, more customary methods (e.g., standard echoic training via modeling) have been exhausted. Unfortunately, SSP itself has mixed research support, probably because certain as-yet-unidentified procedural variations are more effective than others. Even when SSP produces (or increases) vocalizations, its effects can be short-lived. Although specific features of SSP differ across published accounts, fundamental characteristics include presentation of a vocal stimulus proximal with presentation of a preferred item. In the present article, we draw parallels between SSP procedures and autoshaping, review factors shown to affect autoshaping, and interpret autoshaping research for suggested SSP tests and applications. We then call for extended use and reporting of SSP in behavior-analytic treatments. Finally, three bridges created by this article are identified: basic-applied, respondent-operant, and behavior analysis with other sciences.
刺激-刺激配对(SSP)是行为分析从业者使用的一种程序,它利用应答性条件作用过程来引发发声。这些程序通常仅在其他更常规的方法(例如通过模仿进行标准模仿训练)用尽之后才实施。不幸的是,SSP本身的研究支持参差不齐,可能是因为某些尚未确定的程序变体比其他变体更有效。即使SSP产生(或增加)了发声,其效果也可能是短暂的。尽管不同已发表的描述中SSP的具体特征有所不同,但其基本特征包括在呈现偏好物品时同时呈现发声刺激。在本文中,我们将SSP程序与自动塑造进行类比,回顾已显示影响自动塑造的因素,并解读自动塑造研究以用于建议的SSP测试和应用。然后,我们呼吁在行为分析治疗中更广泛地使用和报告SSP。最后,确定了本文搭建的三座桥梁:基础与应用、应答性与操作性、行为分析与其他科学。