Granatosky Michael C, Fitzsimons Aidan, Zeininger Angel, Schmitt Daniel
Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
J Exp Biol. 2018 Jan 22;221(Pt 2):jeb162917. doi: 10.1242/jeb.162917.
During quadrupedal walking in most animals, the forelimbs play a net braking role, whereas the hindlimbs are net propulsive. However, the mechanism by which this differentiation occurs remains unclear. Here, we test two models to explain this pattern using primates and felines: (1) the horizontal strut effect (in which limbs are modeled as independent struts), and (2) the linked strut model (in which limbs are modeled as linked struts with a center of mass in between). Video recordings were used to determine point of contact, timing of mid-stance, and limb protraction/retraction duration. Single-limb forces were used to calculate contact time, impulses and the proportion of the stride at which the braking-to-propulsive transition (BP) occurred for each limb. We found no association between the occurrence of the BP and mid-stance, little influence of protraction and retraction duration on the braking-propulsive function of a limb, and a causative relationship between vertical force distribution between limbs and the patterns of horizontal forces. These findings reject the horizontal strut effect, and provide some support for the linked strut model, although predictions were not perfectly matched. We suggest that the position of the center of mass relative to limb contact points is a very important, but not the only, factor driving functional differentiation of the braking and propulsive roles of the limbs in quadrupeds. It was also found that primates have greater differences in horizontal impulse between their limbs compared with felines, a pattern that may reflect a fundamental arboreal adaptation in primates.
在大多数动物的四足行走过程中,前肢起到净制动作用,而后肢则起到净推进作用。然而,这种分化发生的机制仍不清楚。在此,我们使用灵长类动物和猫科动物来测试两种模型以解释这种模式:(1)水平支柱效应(将肢体建模为独立支柱),以及(2)连接支柱模型(将肢体建模为中间有质心的连接支柱)。通过视频记录来确定接触点、 stance中期的时间以及肢体伸展/收缩持续时间。使用单肢力来计算接触时间、冲冲冲冲量以及每只肢体发生制动到推进转变(BP)的步幅比例。我们发现BP的发生与stance中期之间没有关联,伸展和收缩持续时间对肢体的制动 - 推进功能影响很小,并且肢体之间垂直力分布与水平力模式之间存在因果关系。这些发现否定了水平支柱效应,并为连接支柱模型提供了一些支持,尽管预测并不完全匹配。我们认为质心相对于肢体接触点的位置是驱动四足动物肢体制动和推进作用功能分化的一个非常重要但不是唯一的因素。还发现与猫科动物相比,灵长类动物肢体之间的水平冲量差异更大,这种模式可能反映了灵长类动物一种基本的树栖适应性。