Novak Kamil, Polzer Stanislav, Bursa Jiri
Technol Health Care. 2018;26(1):165-173. doi: 10.3233/THC-171024.
In the paper impact of different material models on the calculated peak wall stress (PWS) and peak wall rupture risk (PWRR) in abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is assessed. Computational finite element models of 70 patient-specific AAAs were created using two different material models - a realistic one based on mean population results of uniaxial tests of AAA wall considered as reference, and a 100 times stiffer artificial model. The calculated results of PWS and PWRR were tested to evaluate statistical significance of differences caused by the non-realistic material model. It was shown that for majority of AAAs the differences are insignificant but for some 10% of them their relative differences exceed 20% which may lead to incorrect decisions on their surgical treatment. This percentage of failures favours application of realistic material models in clinical practise although they are much more time-consuming.
本文评估了不同材料模型对腹主动脉瘤(AAA)计算出的峰值壁应力(PWS)和峰值壁破裂风险(PWRR)的影响。使用两种不同的材料模型创建了70个患者特异性AAA的计算有限元模型——一种基于AAA壁单轴试验平均总体结果的现实模型作为参考,以及一种刚度大100倍的人工模型。对PWS和PWRR的计算结果进行了测试,以评估由非现实材料模型引起的差异的统计学显著性。结果表明,对于大多数AAA,差异不显著,但对于其中约10%的AAA,其相对差异超过20%,这可能导致对其手术治疗的错误决策。尽管现实材料模型耗时得多,但这种失败百分比有利于在临床实践中应用现实材料模型。