Fahal A H, McDonald A M, Marston A
Bloomsbury Vascular Unit, Middlesex Hospital, London, UK.
Br J Surg. 1989 Jan;76(1):22-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800760108.
Between January 1973 and January 1988, 188 patients with unilateral iliac artery occlusion were treated at The Middlesex and University College Hospitals, 185 for primary disease and three for blockage of a previous aortobifemoral graft. In the early part of the series, a variety of operations, including aortofemoral and iliofemoral bypass, and endarteriectomy, was used. Femorofemoral bypass was at first reserved for patients who were considered unfit for major surgery, but the results seemed so good that it was adopted as the procedure of choice. Latterly, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty became available, and the role of this is discussed. Over the 15-year period, 150 patients underwent femorofemoral bypass (all but two receiving a prosthetic graft). Of these, 90 per cent had disabling claudication and 8 per cent had critical ischaemia. There were six early deaths (within 30 days of operation) and five late deaths, and two surviving amputees; nine patients could not be traced. The remaining 128 patients have been assessed at intervals of from 3 to 92 months, both clinically and with Doppler studies. The cumulative patency was 86 per cent at 13 years, and all of these patients experienced subjective and haemodynamic improvement in the recipient limb. Eight grafts occluded in the early postoperative phase. In five patients there was deterioration in the donor limb; it is postulated that the effect was due to causes other than the operation. There were two serious postoperative complications due to technical error, one of which led to early above-knee amputation. These are presented in detail. In the light of this experience, the advantages and indications for femorofemoral bypass and the results to be expected from it have become clarified, and the technique standardized so that errors can be avoided. We suggest that femorofemoral bypass is now the operation of choice for unilateral iliac artery occlusion.
1973年1月至1988年1月期间,米德尔塞克斯医院和大学学院医院共治疗了188例单侧髂动脉闭塞患者,其中185例为原发性疾病,3例为先前主动脉双股动脉移植血管堵塞。在该系列研究的早期,采用了多种手术方式,包括主动脉股动脉和髂股动脉搭桥术以及动脉内膜切除术。股股动脉搭桥术起初仅用于那些被认为不适合进行大型手术的患者,但因其效果良好,后来成为了首选术式。近年来,经皮腔内血管成形术开始应用,本文将讨论其作用。在这15年期间,150例患者接受了股股动脉搭桥术(除2例患者外,其余均接受了人工血管移植)。其中,90%的患者患有致残性间歇性跛行,8%的患者患有严重缺血。术后早期死亡6例(术后30天内),晚期死亡5例,2例存活患者接受了截肢手术;9例患者失访。其余128例患者在术后3至92个月期间接受了临床和多普勒超声检查。术后13年的累积通畅率为86%,所有患者的患侧肢体均在主观和血流动力学方面得到改善。术后早期有8条移植血管闭塞。5例患者的供体肢体出现恶化;据推测,这种影响是由手术以外的原因造成的。因技术失误导致2例严重术后并发症,其中1例导致早期膝上截肢。本文将详细介绍这些情况。基于这些经验,股股动脉搭桥术的优势、适应证以及预期效果已更加明确,技术也已标准化,从而可避免失误。我们认为,股股动脉搭桥术目前是单侧髂动脉闭塞的首选手术方式。