Centre Hospitalier de L'Universite de Montreal, 25443, Montreal, Quebec, Canada ;
University of Calgary, Medicine, Calgary, Canada ;
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr 15;197(8):1036-1044. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201710-1986OC. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
Current diagnosis of chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (cHP) involves considering a combination of clinical, radiological, and pathological information in multidisciplinary team discussions. However, this approach is highly variable with poor agreement between centers.
We aimed to identify diagnostic criteria for cHP that reach consensus among international experts.
A 3-round modified Delphi survey was conducted between April and August 2017. Forty-five experts in interstitial lung disease from 14 countries participated in the online survey. Diagnostic items included in round 1 were generated using expert interviews and literature review. During rounds 1 and 2, experts rated the importance of each diagnostic item on a 5-point Likert scale. The a priori threshold of consensus was ≥ 75% of experts rating a diagnostic item as very important or important. In the third round, experts graded the items that met consensus as important and provided their level of diagnostic confidence for a series of clinical scenarios.
Consensus was achieved on 18 of the 40 diagnostic items. Among these, experts gave the highest level of importance to the identification of a causative antigen, time relation between exposure and disease, mosaic attenuation on chest imaging, and poorly formed non-necrotizing granulomas on pathology. In clinical scenarios, the diagnostic confidence of experts in cHP was heightened by the presence of these diagnostic items.
This consensus-based approach for the diagnosis of cHP represents a first step towards the development of international guidelines for the diagnosis of cHP.
目前慢性过敏性肺炎(cHP)的诊断需要在多学科团队讨论中综合考虑临床、影像学和病理学信息。然而,这种方法具有很大的变异性,不同中心之间的一致性较差。
我们旨在确定国际专家达成共识的 cHP 诊断标准。
2017 年 4 月至 8 月期间进行了 3 轮改良 Delphi 调查。来自 14 个国家的 45 名间质性肺疾病专家参与了在线调查。第 1 轮中包含的诊断项目是通过专家访谈和文献回顾生成的。在第 1 轮和第 2 轮中,专家们对每个诊断项目的重要性进行了 5 分制的李克特评分。共识的先验阈值为≥75%的专家将诊断项目评为非常重要或重要。在第 3 轮中,专家们对达到共识的项目进行了重要程度评分,并为一系列临床情况提供了他们的诊断信心水平。
在 40 个诊断项目中有 18 个达成了共识。其中,专家们认为确定致病抗原、暴露与疾病之间的时间关系、胸部影像学上的马赛克衰减以及病理学上形态不规则的非坏死性肉芽肿等项目最为重要。在临床情况下,这些诊断项目的存在提高了专家对 cHP 的诊断信心。
这种基于共识的 cHP 诊断方法代表了制定 cHP 国际诊断指南的第一步。