Roth Eric Abella, Cui Zishan, Rich Ashleigh, Lachowsky Nathan, Sereda Paul, Card Kiffer, Moore David, Hogg Robert
a Department of Anthropology and Centre for Addiction Research of British Columbia , University of Victoria , Victoria , British Columbia , Canada.
b British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS , Vancouver , British Columbia , Canada.
Subst Use Misuse. 2018 Apr 16;53(5):816-827. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1388259. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
This study analyzed repeated study visits (n = 2,624) of 693 gay and bisexual men (GBM) in the Momentum Health Study from July, 2012 to June, 2015. Based on recent cross-sectional analyses, we hypothesized that over the study period: (1) hazardous drinking levels would remain high, (2) GBM classified as Hazardous Drinkers will be consistently associated with high risk sex, and (3) GBM classified as Always Hazardous Drinkers differ significantly from Sometimes Hazardous Drinkers.
AUDIT classified participants as Non-Hazardous Drinkers or Hazardous Drinkers, the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Test assessed hazardous drinking trends, and Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) analysis identified Hazardous Drinking covariates. Logistic regression analysis of participants with at least two study visits (575) compared those who were Sometimes Hazardous Drinkers (n = 171) with Always Hazardous Drinkers (n = 129).
At baseline 40% of participants were Hazardous Drinkers, but there was a significant decline in hazardous drinking by visit and Hazardous Drinkers were not significantly associated with high risk sex. Always Hazardous Drinkers had significantly more high risk sex and gay bar attendance, but less often sought Internet sex partners compared to Sometimes Hazardous Drinkers.
Analyses did not support the first two hypotheses, but distinguishing between Always and Sometimes Hazardous drinkers identified a young GBM subgroup associated with significantly higher levels of high risk sex and social support measures. These results suggest interventions programs based on Social Norms Theory, which predicts peer norms among youth are important factors in regulating drinking patterns, may be effective for these men.
本研究分析了2012年7月至2015年6月期间参与“动力健康研究”的693名男同性恋者和双性恋男性(GBM)的多次研究访视(n = 2,624)。基于近期的横断面分析,我们假设在研究期间:(1)危险饮酒水平将保持高位,(2)被归类为危险饮酒者的GBM将始终与高风险性行为相关,以及(3)被归类为始终危险饮酒者的GBM与有时危险饮酒者有显著差异。
AUDIT将参与者分为非危险饮酒者或危险饮酒者, Cochr an-Mantel-Haenszel检验评估危险饮酒趋势,广义估计方程(GEE)分析确定危险饮酒协变量。对至少有两次研究访视的参与者(575名)进行逻辑回归分析,比较有时危险饮酒者(n = 171)和始终危险饮酒者(n = 129)。
在基线时,40%的参与者为危险饮酒者,但危险饮酒情况随访视次数显著下降,且危险饮酒者与高风险性行为无显著关联。始终危险饮酒者有显著更多的高风险性行为和光顾同性恋酒吧的情况,但与有时危险饮酒者相比,较少通过互联网寻找性伴侣。
分析不支持前两个假设,但区分始终和有时危险饮酒者确定了一个年轻的GBM亚组,其与显著更高水平的高风险性行为和社会支持措施相关。这些结果表明,基于社会规范理论的干预项目可能对这些男性有效,该理论预测青年中的同伴规范是调节饮酒模式的重要因素。