Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences , Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences , University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019 May;43(5):900-906. doi: 10.1111/acer.13991. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
Geofencing offers new opportunities to study how specific environments affect alcohol use and related behavior. In this study, we examined the feasibility of using geofencing to examine social/environmental factors related to alcohol use and sexual perceptions in a sample of gay and bisexual men (GBM) who engage in heavy drinking and high-risk sex.
HIV-negative GBM (N = 76) completed ecological momentary assessments for 30 days via a smartphone application and were prompted to complete surveys when inside general geofences set around popular bars and clubs. A subset (N = 45) were also asked to complete surveys when inside personal geofences, which participants set themselves by identifying locations where they typically drank heavily.
Approximately 49% of participants received a survey prompted by a general geofence. Among those who identified at least 1 personal drinking location, 62.2% received a personal geofence-prompted survey. Of the 175 total location-based surveys, 40.2% occurred when participants were not at the location that was intended to be captured. Participants reported being most able to openly express themselves at gay bars/clubs and private residences, but these locations were also more "sexualized" than general bars/clubs. Participants did not drink more heavily at gay bars/clubs, but did when in locations with more intoxicated patrons or guests.
Geofencing has the potential to improve the validity of studies exploring environmental influences on drinking. However, the high number of "false-positive" prompts we observed suggests that geofences should be used carefully until improvements in precision are more widely available.
地理围栏为研究特定环境如何影响酒精使用和相关行为提供了新的机会。在这项研究中,我们检验了使用地理围栏技术来研究与大量饮酒和高危性行为有关的社会/环境因素在男同性恋和双性恋者(GBM)中的可行性,这些 GBM 经常饮酒且性行为风险较高。
HIV 阴性的 GBM(N=76)通过智能手机应用程序完成了 30 天的生态瞬间评估,并在一般地理围栏设置的热门酒吧和俱乐部周围被提示完成调查。一小部分(N=45)也被要求在个人地理围栏内完成调查,参与者通过识别他们通常大量饮酒的地点来设置自己的个人地理围栏。
大约 49%的参与者收到了一般地理围栏提示的调查。在那些确定了至少 1 个个人饮酒地点的人中,有 62.2%收到了个人地理围栏提示的调查。在总共 175 次基于位置的调查中,有 40.2%是在参与者不在预期捕获地点时发生的。参与者报告说,他们在同性恋酒吧/俱乐部和私人住宅中最能自由表达自己,但这些地方比一般酒吧/俱乐部更“性化”。参与者在同性恋酒吧/俱乐部并没有喝得更醉,但在有更多醉酒顾客或客人的地方喝酒更多。
地理围栏有可能提高研究环境对饮酒影响的有效性。然而,我们观察到的大量“假阳性”提示表明,在广泛应用精度提高之前,应谨慎使用地理围栏。