Paul Amal, George Paul V
Department of Cardiology, Christian Medical College Vellore, Tamilnadu 632004, India.
Indian Heart J. 2017 Nov-Dec;69(6):695-699. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2017.04.010. Epub 2017 May 9.
Tenecteplase-based pharmacoinvasive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to yield outcomes comparable to primary PCI in the setting of acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study was designed to compare the efficacy of pharmacoinvasive PCI following successful thrombolysis with Streptokinase versus primary PCI in patients with STEMI.
We conducted a prospective single center observational study in 120 patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI (n=60) and Streptokinase-based pharmacoinvasive PCI (n=60). Patients with Killips class 3 or 4 at presentation, and those with evidence of failed fibrinolysis were excluded. The primary outcome was LV systolic function after angioplasty, as assessed by 2D global longitudinal strain (GLS) using speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), as well as 2D LVEF using Simpson's biplane method.
LV systolic function after PCI was significantly lower in the pharmacoinvasive arm as compared to the primary PCI arm, both by 2D STE (GLS: -9% vs -11%; p=0.03) and 2D Simpson's biplane method (LVEF: 40.7% vs 45.1%; p=0.02). TIMI flow in the culprit vessel prior to angioplasty was better in the pharmacoinvasive arm indicating successful thrombolysis, whereas post angioplasty flow was not different. There was no in-hospital mortality in either group. There was a trend toward increased incidence of acute kidney injury in the pharmacoinvasive arm.
LV systolic function is significantly better after primary angioplasty as compared to pharmacoinvasive PCI following successful thrombolysis with Streptokinase.
在急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中,基于替奈普酶的药物介入性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)已被证明可产生与直接PCI相当的治疗效果。本研究旨在比较链激酶溶栓成功后药物介入性PCI与直接PCI在STEMI患者中的疗效。
我们对120例STEMI患者进行了一项前瞻性单中心观察性研究,这些患者接受了直接PCI(n = 60)和基于链激酶的药物介入性PCI(n = 60)。排除就诊时Killips分级为3或4级的患者以及有溶栓失败证据的患者。主要结局是血管成形术后的左心室收缩功能,通过使用斑点追踪超声心动图(STE)的二维整体纵向应变(GLS)以及使用Simpson双平面法的二维左心室射血分数(LVEF)进行评估。
与直接PCI组相比,药物介入组PCI后的左心室收缩功能明显更低,无论是通过二维STE(GLS:-9%对-11%;p = 0.03)还是二维Simpson双平面法(LVEF:40.7%对45.1%;p = 0.02)。药物介入组血管成形术前罪犯血管的TIMI血流更好,表明溶栓成功,而血管成形术后血流无差异。两组均无院内死亡。药物介入组急性肾损伤的发生率有增加趋势。
与链激酶溶栓成功后的药物介入性PCI相比,直接血管成形术后的左心室收缩功能明显更好。