Nakae Ryuta, Nagaishi Masaya, Takano Issei, Tanaka Yoshihiro, Hyodo Akio, Suzuki Kensuke
Department of Neurosurgery, Dokkyo Medical University Koshigaya Hospital, 2-1-50, Minamikoshigaya, Koshigaya-shi, Saitama 343-8555, Japan.
Department of Neurosurgery, Dokkyo Medical University Koshigaya Hospital, 2-1-50, Minamikoshigaya, Koshigaya-shi, Saitama 343-8555, Japan.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Apr;27(4):e65-e69. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.10.023. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
The Pipeline embolization device (PED), a type of flow diverter, has become an appealing alternative treatment option for large or giant and wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. Carotid cavernous fistula (CCF) resulting from delayed aneurysmal rupture is a rare complication of PED placement with unknown pathophysiology. Here, we describe a case of CCF resulting from aneurysmal rupture following PED placement, and present the details of treatment by transvenous coil embolization. An 81-year-old woman was referred to our hospital for treatment of an 18.0 × 10.3 mm intracranial aneurysm located in the cavernous segment of the left internal carotid artery, noted during an examination of her diplopia. Endovascular treatment was conducted by positioning a single PED (4.75 × 25 mm) across the neck of the aneurysm. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged 8 days post procedure. On post-procedure day 10, her left oculomotor nerve palsy had worsened and she had developed left abducens nerve palsy, left exophthalmos, and left chemosis. Angiography demonstrated left direct CCF because of rupture of the aneurysm that had been treated with PED. Transvenous coil embolization was performed on post-procedure day 11 to treat the CCF, and complete resolution of the CCF and significant thrombus formation within the aneurysm sac were confirmed 11 days after the second procedure. Our angiographic results suggest that the aneurysmal rupture was caused by aneurysmal volume expansion associated with PED-induced thrombosis. Transvenous coil embolization for the treatment of CCF following PED placement constitutes a new challenge.
管道栓塞装置(PED)作为一种血流导向装置,已成为大型或巨大型宽颈颅内动脉瘤颇具吸引力的替代治疗选择。PED置入术后因动脉瘤延迟破裂导致的颈内动脉海绵窦瘘(CCF)是一种罕见并发症,其病理生理机制尚不明确。在此,我们描述一例PED置入术后动脉瘤破裂导致CCF的病例,并介绍经静脉弹簧圈栓塞治疗的详细情况。一名81岁女性因复视检查发现左侧颈内动脉海绵窦段有一个18.0×10.3mm的颅内动脉瘤,被转诊至我院治疗。通过在动脉瘤颈部放置单个PED(4.75×25mm)进行血管内治疗。术后过程顺利,患者术后8天出院。术后第10天,她的左侧动眼神经麻痹加重,出现左侧展神经麻痹、左眼球突出和左球结膜水肿。血管造影显示因PED治疗的动脉瘤破裂导致左侧直接CCF。术后第11天进行经静脉弹簧圈栓塞治疗CCF,第二次手术后11天证实CCF完全消失,动脉瘤腔内有大量血栓形成。我们的血管造影结果表明,动脉瘤破裂是由PED诱导血栓形成导致的动脉瘤体积增大所致。经静脉弹簧圈栓塞治疗PED置入术后的CCF是一项新的挑战。