Ikeda Hiroyuki, Ishii Akira, Kikuchi Takayuki, Ando Mitsushige, Chihara Hideo, Arai Daisuke, Hattori Etsuko, Miyamoto Susumu
Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
Interv Neuroradiol. 2015 Dec;21(6):674-83. doi: 10.1177/1591019915609121. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
Cerebral aneurysm rupture is a serious complication that can occur after flow diverter (FD) placement, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We encountered a case in which direct stress on the aneurysm wall caused by residual blood flow at the inflow zone near the neck during the process of thrombosis after FD placement appeared associated with aneurysm rupture. The patient was a 67-year-old woman with progressive optic nerve compression symptoms caused by a large intracranial paraclinoid internal carotid aneurysm. The patient had undergone treatment with a Pipeline embolization device (PED) with satisfactory adherence between the PED and vessel wall. Surgery was completed without complications, and optic nerve compression symptoms improved immediately after treatment. Postoperative clinical course was satisfactory, but the patient suddenly died 34 days postoperatively. Autopsy confirmed the presence of subarachnoid hemorrhage caused by rupture of the internal carotid aneurysm that had been treated with PED. Although the majority of the aneurysm lumen including the outflow zone was thrombosed, a non-thrombosed area was observed at the inflow zone. Perforation was evident in the aneurysm wall at the inflow zone near the neck, and this particular area of aneurysm wall was not covered in thrombus. Macrophage infiltration was not seen on immunohistochemical studies of the aneurysm wall near the perforation. A hemodynamically unstable period during the process of complete thrombosis of the aneurysm lumen after FD placement may be suggested, and blood pressure management and appropriate management with antiplatelet therapy may be important.
脑动脉瘤破裂是血流导向装置(FD)置入后可能发生的严重并发症,但其潜在机制仍不清楚。我们遇到一例,FD置入后血栓形成过程中,颈部附近流入区的残余血流对动脉瘤壁造成的直接应力似乎与动脉瘤破裂有关。患者为67岁女性,因大型颅内床突旁颈内动脉瘤出现进行性视神经受压症状。患者接受了Pipeline栓塞装置(PED)治疗,PED与血管壁之间的贴附情况良好。手术顺利完成,无并发症,治疗后视神经受压症状立即改善。术后临床过程顺利,但患者在术后34天突然死亡。尸检证实为经PED治疗的颈内动脉瘤破裂导致蛛网膜下腔出血。尽管包括流出区在内的大部分动脉瘤腔已形成血栓,但在流入区观察到一个未形成血栓的区域。颈部附近流入区的动脉瘤壁有穿孔,且动脉瘤壁的这一特定区域未被血栓覆盖。在穿孔附近的动脉瘤壁免疫组化研究中未见巨噬细胞浸润。提示FD置入后动脉瘤腔完全血栓形成过程中可能存在血流动力学不稳定期,血压管理和抗血小板治疗的适当管理可能很重要。