Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Salamanca (IRNASA-CSIC), C/ Cordel de Merinas 40-52, 37008 Salamanca, Spain.
Departamento de Agricultura y Alimentación, Universidad de La Rioja, C/ Madre de Dios 51, 26006 Logroño, Spain.
J Environ Manage. 2018 Feb 1;207:180-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.024. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
Herbicides are essential in agricultural systems for maintaining crop yields, as weeds compromise grain production. Furthermore, the application of organic amendments to soil is an increasingly frequent agricultural practice for avoiding irreversible soil degradation. However, this practice could modify the behaviour of the herbicides applied, with implications for their absorption by weeds. This study evaluated the dissipation, persistence and mobility of the herbicides triasulfuron and prosulfocarb in a sandy clay loam soil unamended and amended with green compost (GC) in a field experiment using single or combined commercial formulations of both herbicides. The study was carried out in experimental plots (eight treatments × three replicates) corresponding to unamended soil and soil amended with GC, untreated and treated with the herbicide formulations Logran, Auros and Auros Plus over 100 days. The half-life (DT) of triasulfuron applied individually was 19.4 days, and increased in the GC-amended soil (46.7 days) due to its higher adsorption by this soil, although non-significant differences between DT values were found when it was applied in combination with prosulfocarb. Prosulfocarb dissipated faster than triasulfuron under all the conditions assayed, but non-significant differences were observed for the different treatments. The analysis of the herbicides at different soil depths (0-50 cm) after their application confirmed the leaching of both herbicides to deeper soil layers under all conditions, although larger amounts of residues were found in the 0-10 and 10-20 cm layers. The application of GC to the soil increased the persistence of both herbicides, and prevented the rapid leaching of triasulfuron in the soil, but the leaching of prosulfocarb was not inhibited. The influence of single or combined formulations was observed for triasulfuron, but not for prosulfocarb. The results obtained highlight the interest of obtaining field data to design rational joint applications of GC and herbicides to prevent the possible decrease in their effectiveness for weeds or the risk of water contamination.
除草剂在农业系统中对于维持作物产量至关重要,因为杂草会影响谷物产量。此外,向土壤中施加有机肥料是一种越来越常见的农业做法,可以避免土壤的不可逆转退化。然而,这种做法可能会改变所施加的除草剂的行为,从而影响杂草对其的吸收。本研究通过田间试验评估了在未添加和添加绿肥(GC)的沙壤土中,单一或混合使用两种除草剂的商业配方后,三唑磺隆和砜嘧磺隆在土壤中的消解、持留和迁移情况。该研究在实验小区(8 种处理×3 次重复)中进行,小区对应于未添加 GC 的土壤和添加 GC 的土壤,未处理和用除草剂 Logran、Auros 和 Auros Plus 处理的土壤,处理时间为 100 天。三唑磺隆单独使用时的半衰期(DT)为 19.4 天,在添加 GC 的土壤中增加到 46.7 天,因为这种土壤对其具有更高的吸附性,尽管当它与砜嘧磺隆一起使用时,DT 值没有显著差异。在所有测试条件下,砜嘧磺隆的消解速度都快于三唑磺隆,但不同处理之间没有观察到显著差异。在施药后不同土壤深度(0-50 cm)分析除草剂,证实了在所有条件下,两种除草剂都会淋洗到更深的土层,但在 0-10 和 10-20 cm 土层中发现了更多的残留。在土壤中添加 GC 增加了两种除草剂的持留时间,并防止了三唑磺隆在土壤中的快速淋洗,但砜嘧磺隆的淋洗并没有被抑制。在三唑磺隆中观察到了单一或混合制剂的影响,但在砜嘧磺隆中没有观察到。研究结果强调了获取田间数据的重要性,以便设计 GC 和除草剂联合应用的合理方案,以防止其对杂草的有效性降低或对水的污染风险增加。