Suppr超能文献

在iSYS平台上对新的重新标准化的25-羟基维生素D检测方法进行评估。

Evaluation of the new restandardized 25-hydroxyvitamin D assay on the iSYS platform.

作者信息

Denimal Damien, Roux Stéphanie, Duvillard Laurence

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry, University Hospital Centre Dijon-Burgundy, France; University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, LNC UMR1231, F-21000 Dijon, France; INSERM, LNC UMR1231, F-21000 Dijon, France.

Department of Biochemistry, University Hospital Centre Dijon-Burgundy, France.

出版信息

Clin Biochem. 2018 Feb;52:156-160. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.11.011. Epub 2017 Nov 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] is the most reliable biomarker of vitamin D status, but until now 25(OH)D assays have suffered from inter-laboratory and inter-assay discrepancies. In the setting of the international Vitamin D Standardization Program, Immunodiagnostic Systems (IDS) recently reformulated and restandardized the 25(OH)D immunoassay available on the automated iSYS platform. In the present study, we evaluated this new generation of the 25(OH)D immunoassay (IS-2500).

METHODS

Repeatability and within-laboratory imprecision were verified according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute EP15-A3. Results from the sera of 63 patients were compared with those obtained with the previous iSYS method (IS-2700S) using Passing-Bablok and Bland-Altman analysis. The prevalence and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) coefficient was calculated to assess the agreement of vitamin D status provided by the two iSYS immunoassays. Fourteen Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) samples were used to evaluate inaccuracy.

RESULTS

Using the EP15-A3 protocol, repeatability and within-laboratory imprecision obtained with the new iSYS method were lower than 6% and 8%, respectively. These results are consistent with the manufacturer's claims. In more adverse conditions (50 measurements over 15days with multiple calibrations), the within-laboratory imprecision was 14.8% (39nmol/L) and 7.7% (155nmol/L). 25(OH)D concentrations measured with the new assay showed a strong correlation with those provided by the previous version (r=0.969, p<0.0001). The Passing-Bablok regression equation was as follows: new assay=1.079 x (previous assay) - 3.6nmol/L. The PABAK coefficient of 0.810 reflected almost perfect agreement between the two immunoassays to classify patients according to their vitamin D status (85.7% of agreement). Using DEQAS samples, the mean inaccuracy bias was lower than 5% when the new iSYS method was compared with LC-MS/MS methods and the NIST reference measurement procedure.

CONCLUSION

The new generation of the iSYS immunoassay evaluated in this study meets requirements for routinely measuring 25(OH)D levels in clinical laboratories.

摘要

背景

25-羟维生素D[25(OH)D]是维生素D状态最可靠的生物标志物,但到目前为止,25(OH)D检测一直存在实验室间和检测方法间的差异。在国际维生素D标准化计划的背景下,免疫诊断系统公司(IDS)最近对自动iSYS平台上可用的25(OH)D免疫检测方法进行了重新配方和重新标准化。在本研究中,我们评估了新一代的25(OH)D免疫检测方法(IS-2500)。

方法

根据临床和实验室标准协会EP15-A3验证重复性和实验室内不精密度。使用Passing-Bablok和Bland-Altman分析,将63例患者血清的检测结果与先前iSYS方法(IS-2700S)获得的结果进行比较。计算患病率和偏差调整kappa(PABAK)系数,以评估两种iSYS免疫检测方法所提供的维生素D状态的一致性。使用14个维生素D外部质量评估计划(DEQAS)样本评估不准确性。

结果

采用EP15-A3方案,新iSYS方法获得的重复性和实验室内不精密度分别低于6%和8%。这些结果与制造商的声明一致。在更不利的条件下(15天内进行50次测量并多次校准),实验室内不精密度为14.8%(39nmol/L)和7.7%(155nmol/L)。新检测方法测得的25(OH)D浓度与先前版本提供的浓度显示出很强的相关性(r=0.969,p<0.0001)。Passing-Bablok回归方程如下:新检测方法=1.079×(先前检测方法)-3.6nmol/L。PABAK系数为0.810,反映了两种免疫检测方法在根据患者维生素D状态进行分类方面几乎完全一致(一致性为85.7%)。使用DEQAS样本,将新iSYS方法与液相色谱-串联质谱法和美国国家标准与技术研究院参考测量程序进行比较时,平均不准确性偏差低于5%。

结论

本研究中评估的新一代iSYS免疫检测方法符合临床实验室常规测量25(OH)D水平的要求。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验