Suppr超能文献

医生对将高级执业药师融入医疗实践的看法。

Physician perceptions of integrating advanced practice pharmacists into practice.

作者信息

Williams Charlene R, Woodall Tasha, Wilson Courtenay Gilmore, Griffin Reid, Galvin Shelley L, LaVallee Lisa A, Roberts Courtney, Ives Timothy J

出版信息

J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2018 Jan-Feb;58(1):73-78.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.10.014. Epub 2017 Nov 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Barriers have prevented full integration of advanced practice pharmacists (APPs) into collaborative practice in some areas despite evidence describing their value. APPs in North Carolina can be recognized as Clinical Pharmacist Practitioners (CPPs) under a collaborative practice agreement and provide comprehensive medication management under physician supervision. This study describes the perceptions of physicians regarding the barriers and benefits of integrating CPPs into interprofessional teams and compares physician and CPP perceptions.

METHODS

This prospective descriptive study surveyed CPP supervising physicians in North Carolina. The questionnaire consisted of 17 multiple-choice and free-response questions. Questions included demographics, perceived benefits and challenges of incorporating CPPs into health care teams, and services provided by CPPs. Findings were compared with previously published data that assessed CPP perceptions about the same topics to gain insight into common perspectives of team members.

RESULTS

Fifty-six physicians (23.1%) responded, identifying enhanced clinical outcomes (87.5%), access to drug knowledge (58.9%), and creation of a multidisciplinary model for learners (57.1%) as the top benefits of working with CPPs. Primary barriers included limited reimbursement (60.7%) and billing difficulties (51.8%). More CPPs acknowledged provider acceptance as a barrier (25.9% vs. 3.6%; P = 0.001). Twelve physicians (21.4%) and no CPPs identified space as a barrier.

CONCLUSION

Physicians identified enhanced clinical outcomes, access to drug knowledge, and creation of a multidisciplinary model for learners as the top benefits of incorporating CPPs into teams, and billing difficulties and limited reimbursement were the primary barriers. These findings were similar to the perceptions of CPPs, with exceptions being that physicians were more concerned about space limitations and CPPs noted that provider acceptance may be difficult. These findings may provide guidance to providers desiring to establish collaborative practice.

摘要

目的

尽管有证据表明高级执业药师(APPs)的价值,但在某些领域,障碍阻碍了他们全面融入协作实践。根据协作实践协议,北卡罗来纳州的APPs可被认可为临床药师从业者(CPPs),并在医生监督下提供全面的药物管理。本研究描述了医生对将CPPs纳入跨专业团队的障碍和益处的看法,并比较了医生和CPPs的看法。

方法

这项前瞻性描述性研究对北卡罗来纳州的CPPs督导医生进行了调查。问卷包括17个多项选择题和自由回答问题。问题包括人口统计学、将CPPs纳入医疗团队的感知益处和挑战,以及CPPs提供的服务。将研究结果与之前发表的评估CPPs对相同主题看法的数据进行比较,以深入了解团队成员的共同观点。

结果

56名医生(23.1%)做出回应,将改善临床结果(87.5%)、获取药物知识(58.9%)以及为学习者创建多学科模式(57.1%)列为与CPPs合作的主要益处。主要障碍包括报销有限(60.7%)和计费困难(51.8%)。更多的CPPs认为提供者的接受是一个障碍(25.9%对3.6%;P = 0.001)。12名医生(21.4%)认为空间是一个障碍,而没有CPPs提到这一点。

结论

医生认为将CPPs纳入团队的主要益处是改善临床结果、获取药物知识以及为学习者创建多学科模式,计费困难和报销有限是主要障碍。这些结果与CPPs的看法相似,不同之处在于医生更关注空间限制,而CPPs指出提供者的接受可能存在困难。这些发现可能为希望建立协作实践的提供者提供指导。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验