Suppr超能文献

药学实践中的资格认证:审视药剂师的观点与认知。

Credentialing in Pharmacy Practice: Examining Pharmacist Views and Perceptions.

作者信息

Lee Sun, Dao Nancy, Hata Micah, Law Anandi V

机构信息

Fred Wilson School of Pharmacy, High Point University, High Point, NC.

Clinical Pharmacy, SCAN Health Plan, Long Beach, CA.

出版信息

Innov Pharm. 2019 Oct 31;10(4). doi: 10.24926/iip.v10i4.2099. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacy practice has evolved to include direct patient care and interprofessional team models. Proper documentation of training and certification is required to verify eligibility for providing specialized services and for reimbursement.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to assess pharmacists' views and perceptions on credentialing with respect to (1) familiarity and perceived importance of credentialing; (2) satisfaction with current credentialing tracking systems; and (3) challenges in adopting a centralized credentialing platform.

METHODS

This study used a cross-sectional, survey design to examine pharmacist perceptions of credentialing. The survey, distributed by the American Pharmacists Association from November 18, 2017 to December 2, 2017, consisted of 11 demographic items and 22 items about familiarity, importance, satisfaction and current systems of credentialing in pharmacy practice. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the sample and outcome variables. Content analysis was conducted on freeform responses.

RESULTS

Data were analyzed from 446 (7.3%) completed surveys of the 6,144 distributed. Respondents were primarily represented by pharmacists from chain stores (29.6%), outpatient clinics (16.6%), and academic settings (15.2%). Job titles included staff pharmacist (33.9%), clinical pharmacist (21.3%), and manager positions (18.3%). Nine of 10 pharmacists reported familiarity with credentialing and considered credentialing as important to the pharmacy profession. Majority agreed with the importance of having a centralized online platform to store credentialing information (96.1%) and to obtain reimbursement (97.1%). Poor integration of data among different platforms (16%) was a common reason for dissatisfaction with current tracking systems. Most respondents (96.5%) were willing to provide information necessary for credentialing; however, over half were concerned about security of the information.

CONCLUSIONS

This study was among the first to examine pharmacist perceptions of credentialing. Pharmacists in this study were familiar with and responsive to participating in credentialing process. They were also supportive of having a centralized credentialing system, but held reservations about security of information.

摘要

引言

药学实践已经发展到包括直接的患者护理和跨专业团队模式。需要对培训和认证进行适当记录,以核实提供专业服务的资格和报销资格。

目的

本研究的目的是评估药剂师对认证的看法和认知,涉及(1)认证的熟悉程度和感知重要性;(2)对当前认证跟踪系统的满意度;以及(3)采用集中式认证平台的挑战。

方法

本研究采用横断面调查设计来考察药剂师对认证的认知。该调查由美国药剂师协会于2017年11月18日至2017年12月2日分发,包括11项人口统计学项目和22项关于药学实践中认证的熟悉程度、重要性、满意度和当前系统的项目。描述性统计用于描述样本和结果变量。对自由回答进行了内容分析。

结果

对分发的6144份调查问卷中的446份(7.3%)完成的调查问卷进行了数据分析。受访者主要来自连锁药店(29.6%)、门诊诊所(16.6%)和学术机构(15.2%)的药剂师。职位包括药剂师(33.9%)、临床药剂师(21.3%)和经理职位(18.3%)。十分之九的药剂师报告熟悉认证,并认为认证对药学专业很重要。大多数人同意拥有一个集中的在线平台来存储认证信息(96.1%)和获得报销(97.1%)的重要性。不同平台之间数据整合不佳(16%)是对当前跟踪系统不满的常见原因。大多数受访者(96.5%)愿意提供认证所需的信息;然而,超过一半的人担心信息的安全性。

结论

本研究是最早考察药剂师对认证认知的研究之一。本研究中的药剂师熟悉并愿意参与认证过程。他们也支持建立一个集中的认证系统,但对信息安全有所保留。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25b5/8051900/89c906f3b90f/21550417-10-04-2099-g1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验