Ng Ka H, Pollock Michael W, Urbanczyk Phillip J, Sangha Susan
Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; Purdue Institute for Integrative Neuroscience, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2018 Jan;147:26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2017.11.011. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
Accurate discrimination among cues signifying reward, danger or safety initiates the proper emotional response in order to guide behavior. Appropriate conditioned inhibition of fear in the presence of a safety cue would allow an organism to engage in reward seeking behaviors. There is currently little known about the mechanisms of reward, fear and safety cue discrimination and how a safety cue can inhibit fear and release reward seeking from inhibition. Here we assess reward, fear and safety cue learning together using a behavioral paradigm that has identified neurons that discriminate among these cues in the basolateral amygdala (BLA) (Sangha, Chadick, & Janak, 2013). Dopamine signaling in the BLA has been implicated in discriminatory reward learning, learned fear responses and fear extinction. We tested the hypothesis that D1 receptor activity will influence reward-fear-safety cue discrimination by using the D1 receptor agonist, SKF-3839, and antagonist, SCH-23390, either systemically or within the BLA during discrimination learning in male Long Evans rats. We show that both the agonist and antagonist interfered with fear suppression in the presence of the safety cue, when administered systemically or when infused directly into the BLA. This indicates that altering D1 receptor activity in the basolateral amygdala impairs fear suppression during a safety cue. Neither the agonist or antagonist had a consistent negative impact on discriminatory reward seeking when infused into the BLA. However, systemic administration of the D1 receptor agonist did reduce reward seeking behavior during a task that included fear and safety cues. We did not observe a negative impact on reward seeking during systemic administration of a D1 receptor agonist in a task that only included reward cue + sucrose and nonreward cue + no sucrose pairings. This indicates the impairments we saw with the systemically applied agonist in the safety-fear-reward cue discrimination task were more likely due to effects on fear and/or motivation rather than on cue discrimination. Together, our data indicate that altered dopamine D1 receptor activity in the BLA may be a potential mechanism that leads to the impairment in fear suppression to the safety signal seen with PTSD patients.
准确区分表示奖励、危险或安全的线索会引发适当的情绪反应,以指导行为。在安全线索出现时,对恐惧进行适当的条件性抑制会使生物体能够参与寻求奖励的行为。目前,关于奖励、恐惧和安全线索区分的机制以及安全线索如何抑制恐惧并解除对寻求奖励的抑制知之甚少。在这里,我们使用一种行为范式共同评估奖励、恐惧和安全线索学习,该范式已确定了在基底外侧杏仁核(BLA)中区分这些线索的神经元(Sangha、Chadick和Janak,2013年)。BLA中的多巴胺信号传导与区分性奖励学习、习得性恐惧反应和恐惧消退有关。我们通过在雄性Long Evans大鼠的区分学习过程中全身或在BLA内使用D1受体激动剂SKF-3839和拮抗剂SCH-23390,来测试D1受体活性会影响奖励-恐惧-安全线索区分的假设。我们发现,当全身给药或直接注入BLA时,激动剂和拮抗剂都会在安全线索出现时干扰恐惧抑制。这表明改变基底外侧杏仁核中的D1受体活性会损害安全线索出现时的恐惧抑制。当注入BLA时,激动剂或拮抗剂对区分性奖励寻求均没有持续的负面影响。然而,D1受体激动剂的全身给药确实在一项包括恐惧和安全线索的任务中减少了奖励寻求行为。在一项仅包括奖励线索+蔗糖和无奖励线索+无蔗糖配对的任务中,我们没有观察到D1受体激动剂全身给药对奖励寻求有负面影响。这表明我们在安全-恐惧-奖励线索区分任务中看到的全身应用激动剂的损害更可能是由于对恐惧和/或动机的影响,而不是对线索区分的影响。总之,我们的数据表明,BLA中多巴胺D1受体活性的改变可能是导致创伤后应激障碍患者对安全信号的恐惧抑制受损的潜在机制。