• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

降钙素原与传统生物标志物对脓毒症或全身炎症反应综合征危重症患者的诊断和预后价值。

Diagnostic and prognostic value of presepsin vs. established biomarkers in critically ill patients with sepsis or systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

机构信息

Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Mar 28;56(4):658-668. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0839.

DOI:10.1515/cclm-2017-0839
PMID:29176018
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory biomarkers may aid to distinguish between systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) vs. sepsis. We tested the hypotheses that (1) presepsin, a novel biomarker, can distinguish between SIRS and sepsis, and (2) higher presepsin levels will be associated with increased severity of illness and (3) with 28-day mortality, outperforming traditional biomarkers.

METHODS

Procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), presepsin, and lactate were analyzed in 60 consecutive patients (sepsis and SIRS, n=30 per group) on day 1 (D1) to D3 (onset sepsis, or after cardiac surgery). The systemic organ failure assessment (SOFA) score was determined daily.

RESULTS

There was no difference in mortality in sepsis vs. SIRS (12/30 vs. 8/30). Patients with sepsis had higher SOFA score vs. patients with SIRS (11±4 vs. 8±5; p=0.023), higher presepsin (AUC=0.674; p<0.021), PCT (AUC=0.791; p<0.001), CRP (AUC=0.903; p<0.0001), but not lactate (AUC=0.506; p=0.941). Unlike other biomarkers, presepsin did not correlate with SOFA on D1. All biomarkers were associated with mortality on D1: presepsin (AUC=0.734; p=0.0006; best cutoff=1843 pg/mL), PCT (AUC=0.844; p<0.0001), CRP (AUC=0.701; p=0.0048), and lactate (AUC=0.778; p<0.0001). Multiple regression analyses showed independent associations of CRP with diagnosis of sepsis, and CRP and lactate with mortality. Increased neutrophils (p=0.002) and decreased lymphocytes (p=0.007) and monocytes (p=0.046) were also associated with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Presepsin did not outperform traditional sepsis biomarkers in diagnosing sepsis from SIRS and in prognostication of mortality in critically ill patients. Presepsin may have a limited adjunct value for both diagnosis and an early risk stratification, performing independently of clinical illness severity.

摘要

背景

炎症生物标志物可辅助鉴别全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)与脓毒症。我们检验了以下假说:(1)新型标志物降钙素原前肽(presepsin)可鉴别 SIRS 与脓毒症,(2)presepsin 水平升高与疾病严重程度相关,(3)与 28 天死亡率相关,优于传统标志物。

方法

60 例连续患者(脓毒症和 SIRS,每组 30 例)于第 1 天(D1)至第 3 天(脓毒症发作或心脏手术后)检测降钙素原(PCT)、C 反应蛋白(CRP)、presepsin 和乳酸。每日确定全身器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分。

结果

脓毒症与 SIRS 患者死亡率无差异(12/30 比 8/30)。脓毒症患者 SOFA 评分高于 SIRS 患者(11±4 比 8±5;p=0.023),presepsin(AUC=0.674;p<0.021)、PCT(AUC=0.791;p<0.001)、CRP(AUC=0.903;p<0.0001)水平升高,但乳酸水平无差异(AUC=0.506;p=0.941)。与其他标志物不同,presepsin 与 D1 的 SOFA 无相关性。所有标志物与 D1 死亡率相关:presepsin(AUC=0.734;p=0.0006;最佳截断值=1843 pg/mL)、PCT(AUC=0.844;p<0.0001)、CRP(AUC=0.701;p=0.0048)和乳酸(AUC=0.778;p<0.0001)。多变量回归分析显示 CRP 与脓毒症诊断相关,CRP 和乳酸与死亡率相关。中性粒细胞增加(p=0.002)、淋巴细胞减少(p=0.007)和单核细胞减少(p=0.046)也与死亡率相关。

结论

presepsin 在鉴别 SIRS 所致脓毒症与预测危重症患者死亡率方面,未优于传统脓毒症标志物。presepsin 可能对诊断和早期危险分层具有辅助价值,与临床疾病严重程度无关。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic and prognostic value of presepsin vs. established biomarkers in critically ill patients with sepsis or systemic inflammatory response syndrome.降钙素原与传统生物标志物对脓毒症或全身炎症反应综合征危重症患者的诊断和预后价值。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Mar 28;56(4):658-668. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0839.
2
Soluble CD14 subtype (sCD14-ST) presepsin in premature and full term critically ill newborns with sepsis and SIRS.患有脓毒症和全身炎症反应综合征的早产及足月危重新生儿中的可溶性CD14亚型(sCD14-ST)前降钙素。
Clin Chim Acta. 2015 Dec 7;451(Pt A):65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2015.07.025. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
3
Diagnostic value and prognostic evaluation of Presepsin for sepsis in an emergency department.急诊室中普雷斯帕辛对脓毒症的诊断价值及预后评估
Crit Care. 2013 Oct 20;17(5):R244. doi: 10.1186/cc13070.
4
Presepsin as a predictor of septic shock in patients with urinary tract infection.降钙素原在预测尿路感染患者感染性休克中的作用。
BMC Urol. 2021 Oct 12;21(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00906-4.
5
[Early diagnostic value of Presepsin in sepsis: a prospective study on a population with suspected sepsis in fever clinics].前降钙素原在脓毒症中的早期诊断价值:发热门诊疑似脓毒症患者的前瞻性研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Apr;36(4):340-344. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230828-00700.
6
Diagnostic Value of Presepsin in Neonatal Sepsis.前降钙素原在新生儿败血症中的诊断价值。
Egypt J Immunol. 2016 Jun;23(2):29-37.
7
Presepsin a Diagnostic Marker for Sepsis in Intensive Care Unit Patients.前降钙素原:重症监护病房患者脓毒症的诊断标志物
Egypt J Immunol. 2016 Jun;23(2):109-118.
8
Presepsin is an early monitoring biomarker for predicting clinical outcome in patients with sepsis.血清淀粉样蛋白前体是预测脓毒症患者临床结局的早期监测生物标志物。
Clin Chim Acta. 2016 Sep 1;460:93-101. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.06.030. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
9
Presepsin versus other biomarkers to predict sepsis and septic shock in patients with infection defined by Sepsis-3 criteria: the PREDI study of diagnostic accuracy.降钙素原与其他生物标志物对 Sepsis-3 标准定义的感染患者预测脓毒症和脓毒性休克的比较:诊断准确性的 PREDI 研究。
Emergencias. 2019 Oct;31(5):311-317.
10
Interleukin-6 Levels Act as a Diagnostic Marker for Infection and a Prognostic Marker in Patients with Organ Dysfunction in Intensive Care Units.白细胞介素-6水平作为重症监护病房感染的诊断标志物及器官功能障碍患者的预后标志物。
Shock. 2016 Sep;46(3):254-60. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000616.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing sepsis management: the role of dynamic heparin-binding protein monitoring in elderly patients.加强脓毒症管理:动态肝素结合蛋白监测在老年患者中的作用
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 11;12:1538515. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1538515. eCollection 2025.
2
Presepsin, procalcitonin, interleukin-6, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein for predicting bacterial DNAaemia among patients with sepsis.降钙素原、前降钙素、白细胞介素-6和高敏C反应蛋白在脓毒症患者中预测细菌血症的作用
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Feb 28;17(2):991-1001. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-1714. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
3
Presepsin in Critical Illness: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives.
危重症中的前降钙素:当前认知与未来展望。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jun 20;14(12):1311. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14121311.
4
Diagnostic and prognostic value of heparin-binding protein in sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.肝素结合蛋白在脓毒症中的诊断和预后价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 21;103(25):e38525. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038525.
5
New findings on CD16CD62L neutrophil subtypes in sepsis-associated ARDS: an observational clinical study.关于脓毒症相关 ARDS 中 CD16CD62L 中性粒细胞亚型的新发现:一项观察性临床研究。
Front Immunol. 2024 Mar 28;15:1331050. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1331050. eCollection 2024.
6
Hierarchical Capability in Distinguishing Severities of Sepsis via Serum Lactate: A Network Meta-Analysis.通过血清乳酸区分脓毒症严重程度的分层能力:一项网状Meta分析
Biomedicines. 2024 Feb 17;12(2):447. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12020447.
7
Procalcitonin for the diagnosis of postoperative bacterial infection after adult cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.降钙素原在成人心脏手术后术后细菌感染诊断中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2024 Feb 7;28(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04824-3.
8
Progress in the study of biomarkers for early prediction of systemic inflammatory response syndrome after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜碎石取石术后全身炎症反应综合征早期预测的生物标志物研究进展。
Front Immunol. 2023 Mar 30;14:1142346. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1142346. eCollection 2023.
9
Accuracy of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对新生儿败血症诊断的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 14;12(12):e060391. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060391.
10
Is There a Role of Presepsin as a Novel Biomarker in Pediatric Sepsis?可溶性髓系细胞触发受体-1作为小儿脓毒症新型生物标志物的作用研究?
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 Jun;26(6):712-716. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24202.