Pincus Daniel, Ravi Bheeshma, Wasserstein David, Huang Anjie, Paterson J Michael, Nathens Avery B, Kreder Hans J, Jenkinson Richard J, Wodchis Walter P
Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
JAMA. 2017 Nov 28;318(20):1994-2003. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17606.
Although wait times for hip fracture surgery have been linked to mortality and are being used as quality-of-care indicators worldwide, controversy exists about the duration of the wait that leads to complications.
To use population-based wait-time data to identify the optimal time window in which to conduct hip fracture surgery before the risk of complications increases.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Population-based, retrospective cohort study of adults undergoing hip fracture surgery between April 1, 2009, and March 31, 2014, at 72 hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Risk-adjusted restricted cubic splines modeled the probability of each complication according to wait time. The inflection point (in hours) when complications began to increase was used to define early and delayed surgery. To evaluate the robustness of this definition, outcomes among propensity-score matched early and delayed surgical patients were compared using percent absolute risk differences (RDs, with 95% CIs).
Time elapsed from hospital arrival to surgery (in hours).
Mortality within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included a composite of mortality or other medical complications (myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and pneumonia).
Among 42 230 patients with hip fracture (mean [SD] age, 80.1 years [10.7], 70.5% women) who met study entry criteria, overall mortality at 30 days was 7.0%. The risk of complications increased when wait times were greater than 24 hours, irrespective of the complication considered. Compared with 13 731 propensity-score matched patients who received surgery earlier, 13 731 patients who received surgery after 24 hours had a significantly higher risk of 30-day mortality (898 [6.5%] vs 790 [5.8%]; % absolute RD, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.23-1.35) and the composite outcome (1680 [12.2%]) vs 1383 [10.1%]; % absolute RD, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.43-2.89).
Among adults undergoing hip fracture surgery, increased wait time was associated with a greater risk of 30-day mortality and other complications. A wait time of 24 hours may represent a threshold defining higher risk.
尽管髋部骨折手术的等待时间与死亡率相关,且在全球范围内被用作医疗质量指标,但对于导致并发症的等待时长仍存在争议。
利用基于人群的等待时间数据,确定在并发症风险增加之前进行髋部骨折手术的最佳时间窗。
设计、地点和参与者:对2009年4月1日至2014年3月31日期间在加拿大安大略省72家医院接受髋部骨折手术的成年人进行基于人群的回顾性队列研究。风险调整后的受限立方样条根据等待时间对每种并发症的概率进行建模。并发症开始增加时的拐点(以小时计)用于定义早期手术和延迟手术。为评估该定义的稳健性,使用绝对风险差异百分比(RDs,95%CI)比较倾向评分匹配的早期和延迟手术患者的结局。
从入院到手术的时间(以小时计)。
30天内的死亡率。次要结局包括死亡或其他医疗并发症(心肌梗死、深静脉血栓形成、肺栓塞和肺炎)的综合情况。
在符合研究纳入标准的42230例髋部骨折患者(平均[标准差]年龄80.1岁[10.7],70.5%为女性)中,30天的总体死亡率为7.0%。无论考虑哪种并发症,当等待时间超过24小时时,并发症风险都会增加。与13731例倾向评分匹配且较早接受手术的患者相比,13731例在24小时后接受手术的患者30天死亡率显著更高(898例[6.5%]对790例[5.8%];绝对RD百分比,0.79;95%CI,0.23 - 1.35),综合结局(1680例[12.2%]对1383例[10.1%];绝对RD百分比,2.16;95%CI,1.43 - 2.89)。
在接受髋部骨折手术的成年人中,等待时间延长与30天死亡率及其他并发症风险增加相关。24小时的等待时间可能是定义更高风险的阈值。