Suppr超能文献

原始论文:在进行开斋节斋戒的 2 型糖尿病患者中,对比地特胰岛素/门冬胰岛素与双时相门冬胰岛素 30 的疗效和安全性分析:一项 3 期、多中心、国际性、开放性标签、随机、靶向治疗的临床试验。

Original paper: Efficacy and safety analysis of insulin degludec/insulin aspart compared with biphasic insulin aspart 30: A phase 3, multicentre, international, open-label, randomised, treat-to-target trial in patients with type 2 diabetes fasting during Ramadan.

机构信息

Endocrine Department, Dubai Hospital, Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Internal Medicine Department, Head Division of Endocrinology, Rafic Hariri University Hospital, Bir Hassan, Jinah, POB: 5244, 2833-7401, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Jan;135:218-226. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.11.027. Epub 2017 Nov 26.

Abstract

AIMS

To compare the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) and biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) before, during and after Ramadan in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who fasted during Ramadan.

METHODS

In this multinational, randomised, treat-to-target trial, patients with T2DM who intended to fast and were on basal, pre- or self-mixed insulin ± oral antidiabetic drugs for ≥90 days were randomised (1:1) to IDegAsp twice daily (BID) or BIAsp 30 BID. Treatment period included pre-Ramadan treatment initiation (with insulin titration for 8-20 weeks), Ramadan (4 weeks) and post-Ramadan (4 weeks). Insulin doses were reduced by 30-50% for the pre-dawn meal (suhur) on the first day of Ramadan, and readjusted to the pre-Ramadan levels at the end of Ramadan. Hypoglycaemia was analysed as overall (severe or plasma glucose <3.1 mmol/L [56 mg/dL]), nocturnal (00:01-05:59) or severe (requiring assistance of another person).

RESULTS

During the treatment period, IDegAsp (n = 131) had significantly lower overall and nocturnal hypoglycaemia rates with similar glycaemic efficacy, versus BIAsp 30 (n = 132). During Ramadan, despite achieving significantly lower pre-iftar (meal at sunset) self-measured plasma glucose (estimated treatment difference: -0.54 mmol/L [-1.02; -0.07], p = .0247; post hoc) with similar overall glycaemic efficacy, IDegAsp showed significantly lower overall and nocturnal hypoglycaemia rates versus BIAsp 30.

CONCLUSIONS

IDegAsp is a suitable therapeutic agent for patients who need insulin for sustained glucose control before, during and after Ramadan fasting, with a significantly lower risk of hypoglycaemia, versus BIAsp 30, an existing premixed insulin analogue.

摘要

目的

比较德谷胰岛素/门冬胰岛素(IDegAsp)和双时相门冬胰岛素 30(BIAsp 30)在进行开斋节斋戒的 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中的疗效和安全性,这些患者在开斋节前已使用基础、预混或自我混合胰岛素±口服抗糖尿病药物治疗至少 90 天。

方法

在这项多中心、随机、靶向治疗试验中,计划开斋节斋戒且已使用基础、预混或自我混合胰岛素±口服抗糖尿病药物治疗至少 90 天的 T2DM 患者按 1:1 随机(双盲)分为每日 2 次皮下注射 IDegAsp 或每日 2 次皮下注射 BIAsp 30。治疗期包括开斋节前治疗启动期(胰岛素滴定 8-20 周)、开斋节(4 周)和开斋节后(4 周)。开斋节前的第一日黎明前餐(封斋饭)时胰岛素剂量减少 30-50%,开斋节后恢复到开斋节前的水平。低血糖分析为总体(严重或血糖<3.1mmol/L[56mg/dL])、夜间(00:01-05:59)或严重(需要他人帮助)。

结果

在治疗期间,IDegAsp(n=131)与 BIAsp 30(n=132)相比,总体和夜间低血糖发生率显著降低,而血糖控制效果相似。在开斋节期间,尽管实现了更低的预开斋(日落时的餐食)自我测量的血浆葡萄糖(估计治疗差异:-0.54mmol/L[-1.02; -0.07],p=0.0247;事后检验),且总体血糖控制效果相似,但与 BIAsp 30 相比,IDegAsp 显示出更低的总体和夜间低血糖发生率。

结论

IDegAsp 是一种适合在开斋节前、开斋节期间和开斋节后需要胰岛素以持续控制血糖的患者的治疗药物,与现有的预混胰岛素类似物 BIAsp 30 相比,低血糖风险显著降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验