Rosenthal D, Evans R D, Borrero E, Lamis P A, Clark M D, Daniel W W
Department of Vascular Surgery, Georgia Baptist Medical Center, Medical College of Georgia, Atlanta.
J Vasc Surg. 1989 Feb;9(2):261-70. doi: 10.1067/mva.1989.vs0090261.
Many patients who suffer a massive pulmonary embolus die despite emergent therapy. In these desperately ill patients an aggressive, combined method of management was initiated to improve their chances and quality of survival. During a 5-year period 10 patients were treated with (1) low-dose topical, intrapulmonary thrombolytic therapy to dissolve thrombus, (streptokinase or urokinase); (2) anticoagulation to prevent thrombus propagation (heparin); and (3) the simultaneous insertion of a Greenfield filter to prevent the early, recurrent, and therefore potentially fatal pulmonary embolus--"triple-armed therapy." Thrombolytic therapy was administered through a Swan-Ganz catheter wedged against the pulmonary embolus. During the same interval 10 other patients also sustained massive pulmonary emboli but were treated only with systemic heparin. Serial pulmonary arteriography was performed daily. The patients treated by triple-armed therapy responded favorably with a rapid (less than 6 hours), significant improvement in PaO2, pulmonary artery pressure, cardiac output, pulmonary vascular resistance, and blood pressure, compared with patients treated with continuous heparin alone. Nine patients in the triple-armed therapy group survived whereas only six in the heparin group survived. Two additional patients were treated by triple-armed therapy and had thrombolysis with triple-armed therapy with tissue plasminogen activator; these patients demonstrated the most rapid improvement in cardiorespiratory dynamics and arteriographic clearance of emboli. This management protocol shows promise for patients who sustain a massive pulmonary embolus, because it reduces the morbidity associated with pulmonary embolectomy while avoiding the hazards associated with systemic thrombolytic therapy.
许多患有大面积肺栓塞的患者尽管接受了紧急治疗仍会死亡。对于这些病情危急的患者,启动了一种积极的联合治疗方法,以提高他们的生存几率和生存质量。在5年期间,10名患者接受了以下治疗:(1)低剂量局部肺内溶栓治疗以溶解血栓(链激酶或尿激酶);(2)抗凝治疗以防止血栓扩展(肝素);(3)同时置入格林菲尔德滤器以预防早期、复发性且因此可能致命的肺栓塞——“三联疗法”。溶栓治疗通过楔入肺栓塞部位的 Swan-Ganz 导管进行。在同一时期,另外10名患者也发生了大面积肺栓塞,但仅接受了全身肝素治疗。每天进行系列肺动脉造影。与仅接受持续肝素治疗的患者相比,接受三联疗法治疗的患者 PaO₂、肺动脉压、心输出量、肺血管阻力和血压迅速(少于6小时)且显著改善。三联疗法组有9名患者存活,而肝素组仅有6名患者存活。另外2名患者接受了三联疗法并使用组织型纤溶酶原激活剂进行溶栓;这些患者的心肺动力学改善最为迅速,动脉造影显示栓子清除。这种治疗方案对患有大面积肺栓塞的患者显示出前景,因为它降低了与肺栓子切除术相关的发病率,同时避免了与全身溶栓治疗相关的风险。