• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直肠类癌的局部手术切除与内镜切除:一项荟萃分析。

Local surgical excision versus endoscopic resection for rectal carcinoid: A meta-analysis.

作者信息

Sui Qiaoqi, Lin Junzhong, Peng Jianhong, Zhao Yujie, Deng Yuxiang, Pan Zhizhong

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine Guangzhou.

出版信息

J Cancer. 2017 Oct 23;8(19):3969-3974. doi: 10.7150/jca.21476. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.7150/jca.21476
PMID:29187871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5705998/
Abstract

To date, there is not enough evidence concerning the optimal treatment strategy for early rectal carcinoids, we conducted a meta-analysis in order to determine the feasible local treatment for these selected patients. : We searched the studies from the PubMed, Cochrane database, Medline, Ovid, SpringerLink, PMC and Embase between January 2007 and April 2017. Studies of local surgical excision compared with endoscopic resection for rectal carcinoids less than 20mm without adverse features were included. Data were analyzed by using Stata SE 12.0. Seven studies were included in this meta-analysis, with a total of 1056 patients. The data showed that local surgical excision was associated with higher complete resection rate than that of endoscopic resection (OR 5.837, 95%CI 2.048 to 16.632, P=0.001) but consuming longer procedural time (SMD 1.757, 95% CI 1.263 to 2.251, P=0.000). Additionally, incidences of recurrence and en bloc resection rate were comparable between two kinds of resections. The difference of post-operative complications remained unclear. For rectal carcinoids sized 20mm or smaller without adverse features, endoscopic resection might be an efficient treatment, which achieved a comparable oncological safety as local surgical excision.

摘要

迄今为止,关于早期直肠类癌的最佳治疗策略尚无足够证据,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以确定针对这些特定患者可行的局部治疗方法。我们检索了2007年1月至2017年4月期间来自PubMed、Cochrane数据库、Medline、Ovid、SpringerLink、PMC和Embase的研究。纳入了对无不良特征的直径小于20mm的直肠类癌进行局部手术切除与内镜切除相比较的研究。使用Stata SE 12.0对数据进行分析。该荟萃分析纳入了7项研究,共1056例患者。数据显示,局部手术切除的完全切除率高于内镜切除(比值比5.837,95%置信区间2.048至16.632,P = 0.001),但手术时间更长(标准化均值差1.757,95%置信区间1.263至2.251,P = 0.000)。此外,两种切除方式的复发率和整块切除率相当。术后并发症的差异仍不明确。对于直径20mm或更小且无不良特征的直肠类癌,内镜切除可能是一种有效的治疗方法,其肿瘤学安全性与局部手术切除相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8962/5705998/6e73928cbfd1/jcav08p3969g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8962/5705998/89b6c8e262f4/jcav08p3969g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8962/5705998/cfa89bd2d43c/jcav08p3969g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8962/5705998/8f497e263467/jcav08p3969g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8962/5705998/d47213bb56ab/jcav08p3969g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8962/5705998/6e73928cbfd1/jcav08p3969g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8962/5705998/89b6c8e262f4/jcav08p3969g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8962/5705998/cfa89bd2d43c/jcav08p3969g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8962/5705998/8f497e263467/jcav08p3969g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8962/5705998/d47213bb56ab/jcav08p3969g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8962/5705998/6e73928cbfd1/jcav08p3969g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Local surgical excision versus endoscopic resection for rectal carcinoid: A meta-analysis.直肠类癌的局部手术切除与内镜切除:一项荟萃分析。
J Cancer. 2017 Oct 23;8(19):3969-3974. doi: 10.7150/jca.21476. eCollection 2017.
2
Comparison of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection With Circumferential Incision and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Rectal Carcinoid Tumor.内镜下黏膜切除术环形切口与内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗直肠类癌肿瘤的比较
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Jun;26(3):e56-61. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000266.
3
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection therapies for rectal carcinoid tumors: a meta-analysis.直肠类癌肿瘤内镜切除治疗的疗效与安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Yonsei Med J. 2015 Jan;56(1):72-81. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.1.72.
4
Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal local excision for rectal carcinoid: a comparative study.内镜下黏膜下剥离术与经肛门局部切除术治疗直肠类癌的比较研究
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun 21;14(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0923-4.
5
Comparison of endoscopic therapies for rectal carcinoid tumors: Endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential incision versus endoscopic submucosal dissection.直肠类癌肿瘤内镜治疗的比较:环形切口内镜黏膜切除术与内镜黏膜下剥离术。
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2018 Feb;42(1):24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
6
Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and perioperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)治疗直肠癌:与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术相比的肿瘤学及围手术期结局的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 4;16:380. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2428-5.
7
Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Carcinoids.内镜下黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠类癌的疗效与安全性
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Apr;14(4):575-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.07.048. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
8
Endoscopic mucosal resection with suction vs. endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a meta-analysis.内镜下黏膜切除术联合吸引术与内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗小直肠神经内分泌肿瘤的Meta分析
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Sep;53(9):1139-1145. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1498120. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
9
Surgical management and outcome of rectal carcinoids in a university hospital.大学医院直肠类癌的手术治疗及结果
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb 7;13:31. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0463-3.
10
Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus local excision for early rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜黏膜下剥离术与局部切除术治疗早期直肠癌的系统评价和Meta分析
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Jan;20(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1383-5. Epub 2015 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors and risk factors associated with incomplete endoscopic resection.与内镜下黏膜下剥离术相比,混合内镜下黏膜下剥离术治疗直肠神经内分泌肿瘤的疗效和安全性以及与内镜切除不完全相关的危险因素。
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Mar;8(6):368. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.25.

本文引用的文献

1
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for small submucosal tumors of the rectum compared with endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device.直肠小黏膜下肿瘤的内镜黏膜下剥离术与使用结扎装置的内镜黏膜下切除术的比较
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Feb 16;9(2):70-76. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i2.70.
2
Treatment outcomes of endoscopic resection for rectal carcinoid tumors: an analysis of the resectability and long-term results from 46 consecutive cases.直肠类癌肿瘤内镜切除的治疗结果:46例连续病例的可切除性及长期结果分析
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016 Dec;51(12):1489-1494. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2016.1216591. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
3
Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal local excision for rectal carcinoid: a comparative study.
内镜下黏膜下剥离术与经肛门局部切除术治疗直肠类癌的比较研究
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun 21;14(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0923-4.
4
Surgical management of rectal carcinoids: trends and outcomes from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1988 to 2012).直肠类癌的外科治疗:监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库(1988年至2012年)的趋势与结果
Am J Surg. 2016 May;211(5):877-85. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
5
Cap-assisted EMR for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: comparisons with conventional EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (with videos).帽辅助内镜下黏膜切除术治疗直肠神经内分泌肿瘤:与传统内镜下黏膜切除术和内镜黏膜下剥离术的比较(附有视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 May;83(5):1015-22; quiz 1023-.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.09.046. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
6
Advantage of endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap for rectal neuroendocrine tumors.带帽内镜黏膜切除术治疗直肠神经内分泌肿瘤的优势
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug 21;21(31):9387-93. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i31.9387.
7
Full-thickness excision using transanal endoscopic microsurgery for treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors.经肛门内镜显微手术全层切除治疗直肠神经内分泌肿瘤。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug 14;21(30):9142-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i30.9142.
8
Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Carcinoids.内镜下黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠类癌的疗效与安全性
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Apr;14(4):575-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.07.048. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
9
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection therapies for rectal carcinoid tumors: a meta-analysis.直肠类癌肿瘤内镜切除治疗的疗效与安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Yonsei Med J. 2015 Jan;56(1):72-81. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.1.72.
10
Diagnosis and treatment experience of rectal carcinoid (a report of 312 cases).直肠类癌的诊治体会(附 312 例报告)。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(5):408-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Mar 12.