Mahajan Gagan
From the Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California.
Anesth Analg. 2017 Dec;125(6):2094-2104. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002565.
While the evidence for urine drug testing for patients on chronic opioid therapy is weak, the guidelines created by numerous medical societies and state and federal regulatory agencies recommend that it be included as one of the tools used to monitor patients for compliance with chronic opioid therapy. To get the most comprehensive results, clinicians should order both an immunoassay screen and confirmatory urine drug test. The immunoassay screen, which can be performed as an in-office point-of-care test or as a laboratory-based test, is a cheap and convenient study to order. Limitations of an immunoassay screen, however, include having a high threshold of detectability and only providing qualitative information about a select number of drug classes. Because of these restrictions, clinicians should understand that immunoassay screens have high false-positive and false-negative rates. Despite these limitations, though, the results can assist the clinician with making preliminary treatment decisions. In comparison, a confirmatory urine drug test, which can only be performed as a laboratory-based test, has a lower threshold of detectability and provides both qualitative and quantitative information. A urine drug test's greater degree of specificity allows for a relatively low false-negative and false-positive rate in contrast to an immunoassay screen. Like any other diagnostic test, an immunoassay screen and a confirmatory urine drug test both possess limitations. Clinicians must keep this in mind when interpreting an unexpected test result and consult with their laboratory when in doubt about the meaning of the test result to avoid making erroneous decisions that negatively impact both the patient and clinician.
虽然针对接受慢性阿片类药物治疗的患者进行尿液药物检测的证据不足,但众多医学协会以及州和联邦监管机构制定的指南建议,应将其作为监测患者是否遵守慢性阿片类药物治疗的工具之一。为了获得最全面的结果,临床医生应同时开具免疫分析法筛查和尿液药物确证检测。免疫分析法筛查既可以作为门诊即时检验进行,也可以作为基于实验室的检测进行,是一种成本低廉且便捷的检测项目。然而,免疫分析法筛查的局限性包括检测阈值较高,且仅能提供关于特定数量药物类别的定性信息。由于这些限制,临床医生应明白免疫分析法筛查的假阳性和假阴性率较高。尽管存在这些局限性,但检测结果仍可协助临床医生做出初步治疗决策。相比之下,尿液药物确证检测只能作为基于实验室的检测进行,其检测阈值较低,并能提供定性和定量信息。与免疫分析法筛查相比,尿液药物检测更高的特异性使得其假阴性和假阳性率相对较低。与任何其他诊断检测一样,免疫分析法筛查和尿液药物确证检测都有局限性。临床医生在解读意外检测结果时必须牢记这一点,当对检测结果的含义存疑时,应咨询实验室,以避免做出对患者和临床医生都有负面影响的错误决策。