• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于S-1与卡培他滨作为老年转移性胃癌患者一线化疗的随机II期研究:临床和药物遗传学结果,这些患者有或没有较差的体能状态

A randomized phase II study of S-1 versus capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy in elderly metastatic gastric cancer patients with or without poor performance status: clinical and pharmacogenetic results.

作者信息

Kim Mi-Jung, Kong Sun-Young, Nam Byung-Ho, Kim Sohee, Park Young-Iee, Park Sook Ryun

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Center for Gastric Cancer.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Center for Diagnostic Oncology.

出版信息

Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2018 Jan;28(1):23-30. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000320.

DOI:10.1097/FPC.0000000000000320
PMID:29189588
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the efficacy and safety of S-1 versus capecitabine in elderly patients with metastatic gastric cancer (MGC), and examined the association between cytochrome P450 2A6 (CYP2A6) polymorphisms and treatment outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MGC patients 70-85 years old with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2 or 65-70 years old with ECOG PS 2 were randomized to receive S-1 40 mg/m, twice daily, or capecitabine 1250 mg/m, twice daily, on days 1-14 every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

From May 2007 up to July 2010, 107 patients were enrolled. G3/4 neutropenia developed in 3.8% of each arm, and the most common G3/4 nonhematological toxicities were anorexia and fatigue. Vomiting and tearing were more frequent with S-1 and hand-foot syndrome with capecitabine. The primary endpoint, the overall response rate, was 26.4% (14/53, 95% confidence interval: 14.5-38.3%) in S-1 and 24.1% (13/54, 95% confidence interval: 12.7-35.5%) in capecitabine, both of which exceeded the null hypothesis response rate of 10%. The median time to progression (TTP; 3.2 vs. 3.4 months, P=0.813) and overall survival (OS; 8.5 vs. 10.3 months, P=0.691) were similar in both arms. CYP2A6 polymorphisms were associated with S-1 efficacy. In the S-1 arm only, patients with CYP2A6 variant/variant alleles had worse TTP and OS than those with wild/wild or wild/variant alleles, and in multivariate analysis, the CYP2A6 genotype was predictive for TTP and OS.

CONCLUSION

Both S-1 and capecitabine were active and tolerable for elderly MGC patients. The CYP2A6 genotyping might guide treatment selection.

摘要

目的

本研究调查了S-1与卡培他滨在老年转移性胃癌(MGC)患者中的疗效和安全性,并研究了细胞色素P450 2A6(CYP2A6)基因多态性与治疗结果之间的关联。

材料与方法

年龄在70 - 85岁、东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态为0 - 2的MGC患者,或年龄在65 - 70岁、ECOG体能状态为2的患者,每3周在第1 - 14天随机接受S-1 40mg/m²,每日2次,或卡培他滨1250mg/m²,每日2次。

结果

从2007年5月至2010年7月,共纳入107例患者。每组中3.8%的患者发生3/4级中性粒细胞减少,最常见的3/4级非血液学毒性为厌食和疲劳。S-1组呕吐和流泪更常见,卡培他滨组手足综合征更常见。主要终点,总缓解率,S-1组为26.4%(14/53,95%置信区间:14.5 - 38.3%),卡培他滨组为24.1%(13/54,95%置信区间:12.7 - 35.5%),两者均超过无效假设缓解率10%。两组的中位疾病进展时间(TTP;3.2对3.4个月,P = 0.813)和总生存期(OS;8.5对10.3个月,P = 0.691)相似。CYP2A6基因多态性与S-1的疗效相关。仅在S-1组中,携带CYP2A6变异/变异等位基因的患者的TTP和OS比携带野生/野生或野生/变异等位基因的患者差,多因素分析显示,CYP2A6基因型可预测TTP和OS。

结论

S-1和卡培他滨对老年MGC患者均有活性且耐受性良好。CYP2A6基因分型可能有助于指导治疗选择。

相似文献

1
A randomized phase II study of S-1 versus capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy in elderly metastatic gastric cancer patients with or without poor performance status: clinical and pharmacogenetic results.一项关于S-1与卡培他滨作为老年转移性胃癌患者一线化疗的随机II期研究:临床和药物遗传学结果,这些患者有或没有较差的体能状态
Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2018 Jan;28(1):23-30. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000320.
2
Associations between CYP2A6 polymorphisms and outcomes of adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy in patients with curatively resected gastric cancer.CYP2A6基因多态性与胃癌根治性切除患者辅助性S-1化疗疗效的相关性
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Jan;20(1):146-155. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0586-9. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
3
A phase II study of perioperative S-1 combined with weekly docetaxel in patients with locally advanced gastric carcinoma: clinical outcomes and clinicopathological and pharmacogenetic predictors for survival.一项关于围手术期S-1联合每周多西他赛治疗局部晚期胃癌患者的II期研究:临床结局及生存的临床病理和药物遗传学预测因素
Gastric Cancer. 2016 Apr;19(2):586-596. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0490-3. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
4
[Comparison of the efficacy and safety of capecitabine or tegafur, gimeracil and oteracil potassium capsules combined with oxaliplatin chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer].卡培他滨或替吉奥胶囊联合奥沙利铂化疗方案治疗晚期胃癌的疗效与安全性比较
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2016 Jan;38(1):28-34. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2016.01.006.
5
CYP2A6 and ERCC1 polymorphisms correlate with efficacy of S-1 plus cisplatin in metastatic gastric cancer patients.CYP2A6 和 ERCC1 多态性与 S-1 联合顺铂治疗转移性胃癌患者的疗效相关。
Br J Cancer. 2011 Mar 29;104(7):1126-34. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.24. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
6
Phase II trial of S-1 plus leucovorin in patients with advanced gastric cancer and clinical prediction by S-1 pharmacogenetic pathway.S-1联合亚叶酸钙治疗晚期胃癌的II期试验及S-1药物遗传通路的临床预测
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017 Jan;79(1):69-79. doi: 10.1007/s00280-016-3209-1. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
7
A randomised phase II trial of capecitabine plus cisplatin versus S-1 plus cisplatin as a first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: Capecitabine plus cisplatin ascertainment versus S-1 plus cisplatin randomised PII trial (XParTS II).卡培他滨加顺铂对比 S-1 加顺铂作为晚期胃癌一线治疗的随机 II 期试验:卡培他滨加顺铂确证对比 S-1 加顺铂随机 II 期试验(XParTS II)。
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Sep;101:220-228. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.06.026. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
8
A phase II study of S-1 monotherapy administered for 2 weeks of a 3-week cycle in advanced gastric cancer patients with poor performance status.一项针对体能状态较差的晚期胃癌患者,在3周周期中给予S-1单药治疗2周的II期研究。
Br J Cancer. 2007 Aug 20;97(4):458-63. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603902. Epub 2007 Jul 24.
9
Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic/pharmacogenetic study of a triplet regimen of S-1/irinotecan/oxaliplatin in patients with metastatic colorectal or gastric cancer.S-1/伊立替康/奥沙利铂三联方案治疗转移性结直肠癌或胃癌患者的 I 期临床和药代动力学/药代遗传学研究。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013 Nov;72(5):953-64. doi: 10.1007/s00280-013-2272-0. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
10
Phase II study of S-1 combined with oxaliplatin as therapy for patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer: influence of the CYP2A6 polymorphism on pharmacokinetics and clinical activity.S-1 联合奥沙利铂治疗转移性胆道癌的 II 期研究:CYP2A6 多态性对药代动力学和临床活性的影响。
Br J Cancer. 2011 Feb 15;104(4):605-12. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.17.

引用本文的文献

1
Systemic therapy strategies for elderly patients with gastric cancer.老年胃癌患者的全身治疗策略
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025 Aug 16;17:17588359251363057. doi: 10.1177/17588359251363057. eCollection 2025.
2
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 platinum in the treatment of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter, retrospective, propensity score-matched analysis.S-1联合铂类同步放化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌:一项多中心、回顾性、倾向评分匹配分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Nov 6;15:1394754. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1394754. eCollection 2024.
3
Predictive value of DNA methylation in the efficacy of chemotherapy for gastric cancer.
DNA甲基化对胃癌化疗疗效的预测价值。
Front Oncol. 2023 Sep 12;13:1238310. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1238310. eCollection 2023.
4
Pharmacogenomic-guided dosing of fluoropyrimidines beyond : time for a polygenic algorithm?氟嘧啶基于药物基因组学的给药之外:是时候采用多基因算法了吗?
Front Pharmacol. 2023 May 15;14:1184523. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1184523. eCollection 2023.
5
Clinical outcomes of capecitabine-based versus S-1-based regimens as first-line chemotherapy in patients with unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer: a propensity score matched single-center comparison.卡培他滨方案与S-1方案作为不可切除或转移性胃癌患者一线化疗的临床疗效:一项倾向评分匹配的单中心比较
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020 Aug;11(4):674-684. doi: 10.21037/jgo-20-52.
6
Pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence study between two formulations of S-1 in Korean gastric cancer patients.韩国胃癌患者中S-1两种制剂的药代动力学和生物等效性研究。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019 Sep 3;13:3127-3136. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S219822. eCollection 2019.
7
Should S-1 be better than capecitabine for patients with advanced gastric cancer in Asia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.对于亚洲晚期胃癌患者,S-1是否比卡培他滨更具优势?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Onco Targets Ther. 2018 Dec 27;12:269-277. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S187815. eCollection 2019.
8
IMRT combined with S-1 concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a prospective phase II study.调强放疗联合 S-1 同期放化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌:一项前瞻性 II 期研究。
Invest New Drugs. 2019 Apr;37(2):352-359. doi: 10.1007/s10637-018-00720-0. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
9
Associations between CYP2A6 polymorphisms and outcomes of adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy in patients with curatively resected gastric cancer.CYP2A6基因多态性与胃癌根治性切除患者辅助性S-1化疗疗效的相关性
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Jan;20(1):146-155. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0586-9. Epub 2015 Dec 29.