• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

病例类型、住院时间、机构类型和合并症对成人脊柱畸形手术 Medicare 诊断相关组报销的影响。

Impact of case type, length of stay, institution type, and comorbidities on Medicare diagnosis-related group reimbursement for adult spinal deformity surgery.

机构信息

Spine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana.

San Diego Center for Spinal Disorders, San Diego, California.

出版信息

Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Dec;43(6):E11. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.FOCUS17278.

DOI:10.3171/2017.7.FOCUS17278
PMID:29191102
Abstract

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to educate medical professionals about potential financial impacts of improper diagnosis-related group (DRG) coding in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. METHODS Medicare's Inpatient Prospective Payment System PC Pricer database was used to collect 2015 reimbursement data for ASD procedures from 12 hospitals. Case type, hospital type/location, number of operative levels, proper coding, length of stay, and complications/comorbidities (CCs) were analyzed for effects on reimbursement. DRGs were used to categorize cases into 3 types: 1) anterior or posterior only fusion, 2) anterior fusion with posterior percutaneous fixation with no dorsal fusion, and 3) combined anterior and posterior fixation and fusion. RESULTS Pooling institutions, cases were reimbursed the same for single-level and multilevel ASD surgery. Longer stay, from 3 to 8 days, resulted in an additional $1400 per stay. Posterior fusion was an additional $6588, while CCs increased reimbursement by approximately $13,000. Academic institutions received higher reimbursement than private institutions, i.e., approximately $14,000 (Case Types 1 and 2) and approximately $16,000 (Case Type 3). Urban institutions received higher reimbursement than suburban institutions, i.e., approximately $3000 (Case Types 1 and 2) and approximately $3500 (Case Type 3). Longer stay, from 3 to 8 days, increased reimbursement between $208 and $494 for private institutions and between $1397 and $1879 for academic institutions per stay. CONCLUSIONS Reimbursement is based on many factors not controlled by surgeons or hospitals, but proper DRG coding can significantly impact the financial health of hospitals and availability of quality patient care.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在向医学专业人员普及有关不当诊断相关组(DRG)编码对成人脊柱畸形(ASD)手术潜在经济影响的知识。

方法

使用 Medicare 的住院患者前瞻性支付系统 PC Pricer 数据库,从 12 家医院收集 2015 年 ASD 手术的报销数据。分析病例类型、医院类型/所在地、手术节段数、正确编码、住院时间以及并发症/合并症(CCs)对报销的影响。DRG 将病例分为 3 种类型:1)仅前路或后路融合;2)前路融合联合后路经皮固定但无后路融合;3)前路和后路联合固定融合。

结果

汇总各机构数据,单节段和多节段 ASD 手术的报销费用相同。住院时间延长 1 天(3-8 天),则每例增加 1400 美元的住院费用。后路融合增加 6588 美元,CCs 增加约 13000 美元的报销费用。学术机构的报销费用高于私立机构,分别为 14000 美元(病例类型 1 和 2)和 16000 美元(病例类型 3)。城市机构的报销费用高于郊区机构,分别为 3000 美元(病例类型 1 和 2)和 3500 美元(病例类型 3)。私立机构的住院时间延长 1 天(3-8 天),则每例增加 208-494 美元的报销费用,学术机构的报销费用则增加 1397-1879 美元。

结论

报销金额取决于许多不受外科医生或医院控制的因素,但正确的 DRG 编码可以显著影响医院的财务状况和提供高质量患者护理的能力。

相似文献

1
Impact of case type, length of stay, institution type, and comorbidities on Medicare diagnosis-related group reimbursement for adult spinal deformity surgery.病例类型、住院时间、机构类型和合并症对成人脊柱畸形手术 Medicare 诊断相关组报销的影响。
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Dec;43(6):E11. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.FOCUS17278.
2
Refining risk adjustment for bundled payment models in cervical fusions-an analysis of Medicare beneficiaries.对颈椎融合术捆绑支付模型进行风险调整的精细化研究——以 Medicare 受益人为例。
Spine J. 2019 Oct;19(10):1706-1713. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
3
Variation in Resource Utilization for Patients With Hip and Pelvic Fractures Despite Equal Medicare Reimbursement.尽管医疗保险报销相同,但髋部和骨盆骨折患者的资源利用情况仍存在差异。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jun;474(6):1486-94. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4765-8. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
4
Are current DRG-based bundled payment models for lumbar fusions risk-adjusting adequately? An analysis of Medicare beneficiaries.当前基于诊断相关分组的腰椎融合术捆绑支付模式是否充分进行了风险调整?对 Medicare 受益人的分析。
Spine J. 2020 Jan;20(1):32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.04.024. Epub 2019 May 22.
5
Reaching the medicare allowable threshold in adult spinal deformity surgery: multicenter cost analysis comparing actual direct hospital costs versus what the government will pay.达到成人脊柱畸形手术的医疗保险允许阈值:多中心成本分析,比较实际医院直接成本与政府支付金额。
Spine Deform. 2022 Mar;10(2):425-431. doi: 10.1007/s43390-021-00405-4. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
6
Do older Medicare patients cost hospitals more? Evidence from an academic medical center.老年医疗保险患者会让医院花费更多吗?来自一家学术医疗中心的证据。
Arch Intern Med. 1993 Jan 11;153(1):89-96.
7
DRG prospective, "all payor systems," financial risk, and hospital cost in pulmonary medicine non CC stratified DRGs.肺科非复杂并发症分层诊断相关分组中的诊断相关分组前瞻性、“所有支付方系统”、财务风险和医院成本
Chest. 1988 Oct;94(4):855-61. doi: 10.1378/chest.94.4.855.
8
Financial risk, hospital cost, and complications and comorbidities in medical non-complications and comorbidity-stratified diagnosis-related groups.医疗无并发症和按合并症分层的诊断相关组中的财务风险、医院成本以及并发症和合并症
Am J Med. 1988 May;84(5):933-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90074-5.
9
Financial risk, hospital cost, and complications and comorbidities (CCs) in the non-CC-stratified pulmonary medicine diagnostic-related group Medicare hospital payment system.非并发症和合并症分层的肺病诊断相关分组医疗保险医院支付系统中的财务风险、医院成本以及并发症和合并症
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988 May;137(5):998-1001. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/137.5.998.
10
Current hospital costs and medicare reimbursement for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.当前腹主动脉瘤血管腔内修复术的医院成本及医疗保险报销情况。
J Vasc Surg. 2003 Feb;37(2):272-9. doi: 10.1067/mva.2003.118.

引用本文的文献

1
Comorbidity data collection across different spine registries: an evidence map.多脊柱注册研究中的合并症数据收集:证据图谱。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Mar;32(3):753-777. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07529-3. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
2
Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgeries: All Are Not Created Equal.成人脊柱畸形手术后的并发症:并非所有情况都相同。
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Feb;15(1):137-143. doi: 10.14444/8018. Epub 2021 Feb 12.