The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 Nov;103(6):F530-F538. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313657. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
Physiologically based cord clamping (PBCC) has advantages over immediate cord clamping (ICC) during preterm delivery, but its efficacy in asphyxiated infants is not known. We investigated the physiology of PBCC following perinatal asphyxia in near-term lambs.
Near-term sheep fetuses (139±2 (SD) days' gestation) were instrumented to measure umbilical, carotid, pulmonary and femoral arterial flows and pressures. Systemic and cerebral oxygenation was recorded using pulse oximetry and near-infrared spectroscopy, respectively. Fetal asphyxia was induced until mean blood pressure reached ~20 mm Hg, where lambs underwent ICC and initiation of ventilation (n=7), or ventilation for 15 min prior to umbilical cord clamping (PBCC; n=8). Cardiovascular parameters were measured and white and grey matter microvascular integrity assessed using qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry.
PBCC restored oxygenation and cardiac output at the same rate and in a similar fashion to lambs resuscitated following ICC. However, ICC lambs had a rapid and marked overshoot in mean systemic arterial blood pressure from 1 to 10 min after ventilation onset, which was largely absent in PBCC lambs. ICC lambs had increased cerebrovascular injury, as indicated by reduced expression of blood-brain barrier proteins and increased cerebrovascular protein leakage in the subcortical white matter (by 86%) and grey matter (by 47%).
PBCC restored cardiac output and oxygenation in an identical time frame as ICC, but greatly mitigated the postasphyxia rebound hypertension measured in ICC lambs. This likely protected the asphyxiated brain from cerebrovascular injury. PBCC may be a more suitable option for the resuscitation of the asphyxiated newborn compared with the current standard of ICC.
在早产儿分娩中,生理基础脐带夹闭(PBCC)优于即刻脐带夹闭(ICC),但在窒息婴儿中的疗效尚不清楚。我们研究了足月羊胎儿在围产期窒息后 PBCC 的生理学。
将接近足月的羊胎儿(139±2(SD)天妊娠)进行仪器操作,以测量脐带、颈动脉、肺动脉和股动脉的流量和压力。使用脉搏血氧仪和近红外光谱仪分别记录全身和脑氧合。通过胎儿窒息,直到平均血压降至约 20mmHg,然后进行 ICC 和通气(n=7),或通气 15 分钟后进行脐带夹闭(PBCC;n=8)。测量心血管参数,并使用 qRT-PCR 和免疫组织化学评估白质和灰质微血管完整性。
PBCC 以与 ICC 复苏后相同的速度和方式恢复氧合和心输出量。然而,ICC 羔羊在通气开始后 1 至 10 分钟内平均体动脉血压有快速且显著的过冲,而 PBCC 羔羊则基本没有。ICC 羔羊的脑血管损伤增加,表现为血脑屏障蛋白表达降低,皮质下白质(减少 86%)和灰质(减少 47%)的脑血管蛋白渗漏增加。
PBCC 在与 ICC 相同的时间框架内恢复心输出量和氧合,但大大减轻了 ICC 羔羊测量的窒息后反弹高血压。这可能保护了窒息的大脑免受脑血管损伤。与当前的 ICC 标准相比,PBCC 可能是窒息新生儿复苏的更合适选择。