Nuclear Medicine Unit, Medicina Nucleare Metropolitana, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
Nuclear Medicine Service, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA SB IRCS, Pavia, Italy.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 May;45(5):751-758. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3888-9. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
During our daily clinical practice using 11C-Choline PET/CT for restaging patients affected by relapsing prostate cancer (rPCa) we noticed an unusual but significant occurrence of hypodense hepatic lesions with a different tracer uptake. Thus, we decided to evaluate the possible correlation between rPCa and these lesions as possible hepatic metastases.
We retrospectively enrolled 542 patients diagnosed with rPCa in biochemical relapse after a radical treatment (surgery and/or radiotherapy). Among these, patients with a second tumor or other benign hepatic diseases were excluded. All patients underwent 11C-Choline PET/CT during the standard restaging workup of their disease. We analyzed CT images to evaluate the presence of hypodense lesions and PET images to identify the relative tracer uptake. In accordance to the subsequent oncological history, five clinical scenarios were recognized [Table 1]: normal low dose CT (ldCT) and normal tracer distribution (Group A); evidence of previously unknown hepatic round hypodense areas at ldCT with normal rim uptake (Group B); evidence of previously known hepatic round hypodense areas at ldCT stable over time and with normal rim uptake (Group C); evidence of previously known hepatic round hypodense areas at ldCT, in a previous PET/CT scan, with or without rim uptake and significantly changing over time in terms of size and/or uptake (Group D); evidence of hepatic round hypodense areas at ldCT with or without rim uptake confirmed as prostate liver metastases by histopathology, triple phase ceCT, ce-ultra sound (CEUS) and clinical/biochemical evaluation (Group E). We evaluated the correlation with PSA level at time of scan, rim SUVmax and association with local relapse or non-hepatic metastases (lymph nodes, bone, other parenchyma).
Five hundred and forty-two consecutive patients were retrospectively enrolled. In 140 of the 542 patients more than one 11C-choline PET/CT had been performed. A total of 742 11C-Choline PET/CT scans were analyzed. Of the 542 patients enrolled, 456 (84.1%) had a normal appearance of the liver both at ldCT and PET (Group A). 19/542 (3,5%) belonged to Group B, 13/542 (2.4%) to Group C, 37/542 (6.8%) to Group D and 18/542 (3.3%) to Group E. Mean SUVmax of the rim was: 4.5 for Group B; 4.2 for Group C; 4.8 for Group D; 5.9 for Group E. Mean PSA level was 5.27 for Group A, 7.9 for Group B, 10.04 for Group C, 10.01 for Group D, 9.36 for Group E. Presence of positive findings at 11C-Choline PET/CT in any further anatomical area (local relapse, lymph node, bone, other extra hepatic sites) correlated with an higher PSA (p = 0.0285). In both the univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses. PSA, SUVmax of the rim, local relapse, positive nodes were not associated to liver mets (Groups D-E) (p > 0.05). On the contrary, a significant correlation was found between the presence of liver metG (group D-E) and bone lesions (p= 0.00193).
Our results indicate that liver metastases in relapsing prostate cancer may occur frequently. The real incidence evaluation needs more investigations. In this case and despite technical limitations, Choline PET/CT shows alterations of tracer distribution within the liver that could eventually be mistaken for simple cysts but can be suspected when associated to high trigger PSA, concomitant bone lesions or modification over time. In this clinical setting an accurate analysis of liver tracer distribution (increased or decreased uptake) by the nuclear medicine physician is, therefore, mandatory.
在使用 11C-胆碱 PET/CT 对复发性前列腺癌(rPCa)患者进行再分期的日常临床实践中,我们注意到肝脏出现了异常但明显的低密度病变,其摄取示踪剂的情况也不同。因此,我们决定评估 rPCa 与这些可能为肝转移的病变之间的可能相关性。
我们回顾性纳入了 542 例在根治性治疗(手术和/或放疗)后生化复发的 rPCa 患者。其中,排除了有第二肿瘤或其他良性肝脏疾病的患者。所有患者在疾病标准再分期检查期间均接受了 11C-胆碱 PET/CT 检查。我们分析了 CT 图像以评估低密度病变的存在,并通过 PET 图像来确定相对示踪剂摄取。根据随后的肿瘤学病史,我们识别了五个临床情况[表 1]:低剂量 CT(ldCT)和示踪剂分布正常(A 组);在 ldCT 上发现先前未知的肝脏圆形低密度区域,其边缘摄取正常(B 组);在 ldCT 上发现先前已知的肝脏圆形低密度区域,且在随访期间保持稳定,边缘摄取正常(C 组);在 ldCT 上发现先前已知的肝脏圆形低密度区域,在之前的 PET/CT 扫描中,有或无边缘摄取,且在大小和/或摄取方面在随访期间发生显著变化(D 组);在 ldCT 上发现肝脏圆形低密度区域,有或无边缘摄取,通过组织病理学、三期 ceCT、ce-超声(CEUS)和临床/生化评估确认为前列腺肝转移(E 组)。我们评估了其与扫描时 PSA 水平、边缘 SUVmax 的相关性,以及与局部复发或非肝转移(淋巴结、骨骼、其他实质)的相关性。
我们回顾性纳入了 542 例连续患者。在 542 例患者中,有 140 例进行了多次 11C-胆碱 PET/CT 检查。总共分析了 742 次 11C-胆碱 PET/CT 扫描。在纳入的 542 例患者中,456 例(84.1%)肝脏在 ldCT 和 PET 上均表现正常(A 组)。19/542(3.5%)例属于 B 组,13/542(2.4%)例属于 C 组,37/542(6.8%)例属于 D 组,18/542(3.3%)例属于 E 组。B 组边缘 SUVmax 的平均值为 4.5,C 组为 4.2,D 组为 4.8,E 组为 5.9。A 组 PSA 水平的平均值为 5.27,B 组为 7.9,C 组为 10.04,D 组为 10.01,E 组为 9.36。在任何其他解剖区域(局部复发、淋巴结、骨骼、其他肝外部位)发现 11C-胆碱 PET/CT 阳性发现与较高的 PSA 相关(p=0.0285)。在单变量和多变量二元逻辑回归分析中,PSA、边缘 SUVmax、局部复发、阳性淋巴结与肝转移(D-E 组)均无相关性(p>0.05)。相反,肝脏转移(D-E 组)与骨骼病变之间存在显著相关性(p=0.00193)。
我们的结果表明,复发性前列腺癌可能经常发生肝转移。需要更多的研究来评估真实的发病率。在这种情况下,尽管存在技术限制,胆碱 PET/CT 显示肝脏示踪剂分布的改变,这些改变可能被误认为是单纯性囊肿,但当与高触发 PSA、同时存在的骨骼病变或随时间变化相关时,这些改变可以被怀疑。因此,在这种临床情况下,核医学医师对肝脏示踪剂分布(摄取增加或减少)进行准确分析是非常必要的。