Guo Bin, Wu Baolin
Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S.A.
Biometrics. 2018 Sep;74(3):1120-1124. doi: 10.1111/biom.12823. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
Zhan et al. () presented a kernel RV coefficient (KRV) test to evaluate the overall association between host gene expression and microbiome composition, and showed its competitive performance compared to existing methods. In this article, we clarify the close relation of KRV to the existing generalized RV (GRV) coefficient, and show that KRV and GRV have very similar performance. Although the KRV test could control the type I error rate well at 1% and 5% levels, we show that it could largely underestimate p-values at small significance levels leading to significantly inflated type I errors. As a partial remedy, we propose an alternative p-value calculation, which is efficient and more accurate than KRV p-value at small significance levels. We recommend that small KRV test p-values should always be accompanied and verified by the permutation p-value in practice. In addition, we analytically show that KRV can be written as a form of correlation coefficient, which can dramatically expedite its computation and make permutation p-value calculation more efficient.
Zhan等人()提出了一种核RV系数(KRV)检验,以评估宿主基因表达与微生物组组成之间的总体关联,并展示了其与现有方法相比的竞争性能。在本文中,我们阐明了KRV与现有广义RV(GRV)系数的密切关系,并表明KRV和GRV具有非常相似的性能。尽管KRV检验在1%和5%的水平上能够很好地控制I型错误率,但我们表明,在小显著性水平下,它可能会大幅低估p值,从而导致I型错误显著膨胀。作为一种部分补救措施,我们提出了一种替代的p值计算方法,该方法在小显著性水平下比KRV p值更有效、更准确。我们建议在实际应用中,小的KRV检验p值应始终由置换p值伴随并验证。此外,我们通过分析表明,KRV可以写成相关系数的形式,这可以极大地加快其计算速度,并使置换p值计算更有效。