Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Population Council, Washington, DC, USA.
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Nov 1;32(suppl_4):iv67-iv81. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx097.
Drawing on rich data from the Integra evaluation of integrated HIV and reproductive-health services, we explored the interaction of systems hardware and software factors to explain why some facilities were able to implement and sustain integrated service delivery while others were not. This article draws on detailed mixed-methods data for four case-study facilities offering reproductive-health and HIV services between 2009 and 2013 in Kenya: (i) time-series client flow, tracking service uptake for 8841 clients; (ii) structured questionnaires with 24 providers; (iii) in-depth interviews with 17 providers; (iv) workload and facility data using a periodic activity review and cost-instruments; and (v) contextual data on external activities related to integration in study sites. Overall, our findings suggested that although structural factors like stock-outs, distribution of staffing and workload, rotation of staff can affect how integrated care is provided, all these factors can be influenced by staff themselves: both frontline and management. Facilities where staff displayed agency of decision making, worked as a team to share workload and had management that supported this, showed better integration delivery and staff were able to overcome some structural deficiencies to enable integrated care. Poor-performing facilities had good structural integration, but staff were unable to utilize this because they were poorly organized, unsupported or teams were dysfunctional. Conscientious objection and moralistic attitudes were also barriers.Integra has demonstrated that structural integration is not sufficient for integrated service delivery. Rather, our case studies show that in some cases excellent leadership and peer-teamwork enabled facilities to perform well despite resource shortages. The ability to provide support for staff to work flexibly to deliver integrated services and build resilient health systems to meet changing needs is particularly relevant as health systems face challenges of changing burdens of disease, climate change, epidemic outbreaks and more.
利用 Integra 在整合艾滋病毒和生殖健康服务方面的评估所获得的丰富数据,我们探讨了系统硬件和软件因素的相互作用,以解释为什么有些设施能够实施和维持综合服务提供,而有些则不能。本文借鉴了肯尼亚四家在 2009 年至 2013 年间提供生殖健康和艾滋病毒服务的案例研究设施的详细混合方法数据:(i) 客户流量时间序列,跟踪 8841 名客户的服务使用情况;(ii) 对 24 名提供者的结构问卷调查;(iii) 对 17 名提供者的深入访谈;(iv) 使用定期活动审查和成本工具的工作量和设施数据;以及(v) 与研究地点整合相关的外部活动的背景数据。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,尽管结构因素,如库存不足、人员分配和工作量分布、员工轮班等,会影响综合护理的提供方式,但所有这些因素都可以受到员工自身的影响:前线员工和管理人员。在那些表现出决策自主权的员工、作为一个团队共同分担工作负荷并得到管理层支持的设施中,综合服务提供情况更好,并且员工能够克服一些结构性缺陷,从而提供综合护理。表现不佳的设施具有良好的结构性整合,但由于组织不力、缺乏支持或团队功能失调,员工无法利用这一点。出于职业道德的反对和道德主义态度也是障碍。Integra 已经证明,结构性整合对于综合服务提供来说是不够的。相反,我们的案例研究表明,在某些情况下,卓越的领导力和同侪团队合作使设施能够在资源短缺的情况下表现出色。为员工提供灵活工作以提供综合服务和建立有弹性的卫生系统以满足不断变化的需求提供支持的能力尤其相关,因为卫生系统面临着疾病负担变化、气候变化、疫情爆发等挑战。