Suppr超能文献

深部脑刺激治疗特发性震颤:靶点比较

Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor: A Comparison of Targets.

作者信息

Holslag Joost A H, Neef Nienke, Beudel Martijn, Drost Gea, Oterdoom D L Marinus, Kremer Naomi I, van Laar Teus, van Dijk J Marc C

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Neurology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;110:e580-e584. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.064. Epub 2017 Nov 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for refractory essential tremor (ET). Initially, the target of choice was the thalamic ventralis intermedius nucleus (VIM). However, the zona incerta (ZI) has been suggested as a superior target. Both targets are considered safe and effective, but a direct comparison between these targets is lacking.

METHODS

We analyzed a single-center cohort of 44 patients with ET treated with DBS between 1998 and 2017, targeting the VIM and/or ZI. Patient-reported outcome on the Washington Heights-Inwood Genetic Study of Essential Tremor rating scale, adverse events, and stimulation-induced side effects were assessed.

RESULTS

Patient-reported outcome of ZI DBS (-2.2 ± 1.2; 18 patients with 28 electrodes) was superior to VIM DBS (-1.2 ± 1.4; 10 patients with 19 electrodes) (P < 0.01). There was no difference in adverse events between implantations in VIM (45%) and ZI (46%). Dysarthria stimulation-induced side effects were significantly more often reported after VIM DBS (P = 0.01), whereas visual stimulation-induced side effects occurred more often after ZI DBS (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, ZI DBS was superior to VIM DBS in terms of patient-reported effectiveness. There was a comparable number of complications between both targets. This finding further supports ZI over VIM as the principal DBS target in essential tremor.

摘要

背景

深部脑刺激(DBS)是治疗难治性特发性震颤(ET)的一种既定疗法。最初,首选靶点是丘脑腹中间核(VIM)。然而,有人提出未定带(ZI)是一个更好的靶点。这两个靶点都被认为是安全有效的,但缺乏对这两个靶点的直接比较。

方法

我们分析了1998年至2017年间在单中心接受DBS治疗的44例ET患者的队列,靶点为VIM和/或ZI。评估了患者报告的华盛顿高地-因伍德特发性震颤基因研究评分量表结果、不良事件和刺激引起的副作用。

结果

患者报告的ZI DBS结果(-2.2±1.2;18例患者,28个电极)优于VIM DBS(-1.2±1.4;10例患者,19个电极)(P<0.01)。VIM植入(45%)和ZI植入(46%)之间的不良事件没有差异。VIM DBS后更常报告构音障碍刺激引起的副作用(P = 0.01),而ZI DBS后更常出现视觉刺激引起的副作用(P = 0.04)。

结论

在本研究中,就患者报告的有效性而言,ZI DBS优于VIM DBS。两个靶点的并发症数量相当。这一发现进一步支持将ZI而非VIM作为特发性震颤DBS的主要靶点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验