State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Sciences, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Department of Geoscience, Environment & Society, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 May;24(5):2066-2078. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14002. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
Constraints of temperature on spring plant phenology are closely related to plant growth, vegetation dynamics, and ecosystem carbon cycle. However, the effects of temperature on leaf onset, especially for winter chilling, are still not well understood. Using long-term, widespread in situ phenology observations collected over China for multiple plant species, this study analyzes the quantitative response of leaf onset to temperature, and compares empirical findings with existing theories and modeling approaches, as implemented in 18 phenology algorithms. Results show that the growing degree days (GDD) required for leaf onset vary distinctly among plant species and geographical locations as well as at organizational levels (species and community), pointing to diverse adaptation strategies. Chilling durations (CHD) needed for releasing bud dormancy decline monotonously from cold to warm areas with very limited interspecies variations. Results also reveal that winter chilling is a crucial component of phenology models, and its effect is better captured with an index that accounts for the inhomogeneous effectiveness of low temperature to chilling rate than with the conventional CHD index. The impact of spring warming on leaf onset is nonlinear, better represented by a logistical function of temperature than by the linear function currently implemented in biosphere models. The optimized base temperatures for thermal accumulation and the optimal chilling temperatures are species-dependent and average at 6.9 and 0.2°C, respectively. Overall, plants' chilling requirement is not a constant, and more chilling generally results in less requirement of thermal accumulation for leaf onset. Our results clearly demonstrate multiple deficiencies of the parameters (e.g., base temperature) and algorithms (e.g., method for calculating GDD) in conventional phenology models to represent leaf onset. Therefore, this study not only advances our mechanistic and quantitative understanding of temperature controls on leaf onset but also provides critical information for improving existing phenology models.
温度对春季植物物候的限制与植物生长、植被动态和生态系统碳循环密切相关。然而,温度对叶片起始的影响,特别是冬季休眠的影响,仍未得到很好的理解。本研究利用在中国多个植物物种上长期广泛收集的原位物候观测数据,分析了叶片起始对温度的定量响应,并将经验发现与现有的理论和建模方法进行了比较,这些方法在 18 种物候算法中得到了实施。结果表明,叶片起始所需的生长度日(GDD)在植物物种、地理位置以及组织水平(物种和群落)之间存在明显差异,这表明存在多样化的适应策略。解除芽休眠所需的休眠期(CHD)从寒冷地区到温暖地区单调下降,物种间的变化非常有限。结果还表明,冬季休眠是物候模型的一个关键组成部分,用一个考虑低温对休眠率不均匀有效性的指数来描述其效果比用传统的 CHD 指数要好。春季变暖对叶片起始的影响是非线性的,用温度的逻辑函数来描述比用生物群落模型中当前实施的线性函数要好。热积累的优化基础温度和最佳休眠温度是物种依赖性的,平均为 6.9°C 和 0.2°C。总的来说,植物休眠的要求不是一个常数,更多的休眠通常需要更少的热积累来开始叶片生长。我们的研究结果清楚地表明,传统物候模型中的参数(如基础温度)和算法(如计算 GDD 的方法)存在多种缺陷,无法准确代表叶片起始。因此,本研究不仅推进了我们对温度控制叶片起始的机制和定量理解,也为改进现有的物候模型提供了关键信息。